Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does prior percutaneous coronary intervention influence the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery?
Miguel, Gade S V; Sousa, Alexandre G; Silva, Gilmara S; Colósimo, Flávia C; Stolf, Noedir A G.
  • Miguel, Gade S V; Clínica Girassol. Cardiothoracic Surgeon. Luanda. AO
  • Sousa, Alexandre G; Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa. Clinical Research Physician. São Paulo. BR
  • Silva, Gilmara S; Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa. Center for Education and Research. Research Nurse. São Paulo. BR
  • Colósimo, Flávia C; Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa. Center for Education and Research. Research Nurse. São Paulo. BR
  • Stolf, Noedir A G; University of São Paulo Medical School. São Paulo. BR
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 35(1): 1-8, Jan.-Feb. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1092461
ABSTRACT
Abstract

Introduction:

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been increasingly performed to treat coronary artery disease. The performance of multiple PCI has also been increasing. Consequently, the percentage of patients presenting for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is reported to vary from 13 to 40%. The influence of previous PCI on CABG outcomes has been studied in single center, regional studies, registries and meta-analyses. Some reports showed a negative effect on mortality and morbidity in early or long-term follow-up, but others did not find this influence. Methods and

Results:

A cohort of 3007 patients consecutively operated for CABG, 261 of them with previous PCI, were included in this analysis. Comparison of the groups "previous PCI" and "primary CABG" was made in the original cohort and in a propensity score matched cohort of 261 patients. There were some differences in preoperative clinical characteristics in both types of cohort, even in the matched one. Outcomes were compared at 30 days, 1 year and 5 years of follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality in any period or cohort. There were some differences in other outcomes as readmission and composite events, including cardiovascular death at 1 and 5 years of follow-up. These differences, neverthless, were not confirmed in comparison with the matched cohort.

Conclusion:

Although there are some limitations in this study, it was not found consistent negative influence of previous PCI on CABG.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Type of study: Systematic reviews Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc Journal subject: Cardiology / General Surgery Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Angola / Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Clínica Girassol/AO / Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa/BR / University of São Paulo Medical School/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Type of study: Systematic reviews Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc Journal subject: Cardiology / General Surgery Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Angola / Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Clínica Girassol/AO / Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa/BR / University of São Paulo Medical School/BR