Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors related to non-mammographic visualization in locally advanced breast carcinoma
Watanabe, Anapaula Hidemi Uema; Saito, Marcio Mitsugui; Cabral, Bruno Eduardo Fernandes; Vieira, René Aloisio da Costa.
Affiliation
  • Watanabe, Anapaula Hidemi Uema; Barretos Cancer Hospital ­ Barretos (SP), Brazil. Barretos. BR
  • Saito, Marcio Mitsugui; Barretos Cancer Hospital ­ Barretos (SP), Brazil. Barretos. BR
  • Cabral, Bruno Eduardo Fernandes; Barretos Cancer Hospital ­ Barretos (SP), Brazil. Barretos. BR
  • Vieira, René Aloisio da Costa; Botucatu School of Medicine ­ Botucatu (SP), Brazil. Botucatu. BR
Mastology (Online) ; 30: 1-7, 2020.
Article in En | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1100070
Responsible library: BR2499.9
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To determine the rate and factors related to non-visualization of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) by mammography.

Method:

Prospective, cross-sectional study, conducted in a cohort of consecutive patients with LABC treated at a tertiary cancer hospital. All patients were systematically examined and underwent high-resolution mammography (conventional equipment) in two views (craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique). A blind study was performed in which mammograms were mixed with routine and where radiologists were unaware of the clinical data. Three radiologists evaluated the examinations. In the patients in whom the findings were negative, the possible causes responsible for not identifying the tumor on mammography were evaluated. After the radiological report, the examinations were reviewed, and the radiological data were added to the standard form, making up the database of the present study. Descriptive statistics were used to compare factors related to non-visualization of tumors, namely the chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney test.

Result:

Eighty-five patients were evaluated. The average size of the tumors was 6.96 cm, and 20% of cases were not identified on mammography. Among the causes, 76.4% had dense parenchyma, 17.6% were not visible on examination, and in 5.8%, the lesion was not noticed by the radiologist (false negative examination). The only factor found when LABC was not identified was the type of breast parenchyma (p=0.04).

Conclusion:

Clinical history and changes in physical examination should be considered in the report to the radiologist. High breast density was the major obstacle to mammography diagnosis.
Key words

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Mastology (Online) Journal subject: Neoplasias da Mama Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Mastology (Online) Journal subject: Neoplasias da Mama Year: 2020 Type: Article