Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Are laws restricting soft drinks sales in Brazilian schools able to lower their availability?
Azeredo, Catarina Machado; Leite, Maria Alvim; Rauber, Fernanda; Ricardo, Camila Zancheta; Levy, Renata Bertazzi.
  • Azeredo, Catarina Machado; Universidade Federal de Uberlândia. Faculdade de Medicina. Uberlândia. BR
  • Leite, Maria Alvim; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva. São Paulo. BR
  • Rauber, Fernanda; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública. Departamento de Nutrição. São Paulo. BR
  • Ricardo, Camila Zancheta; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva. São Paulo. BR
  • Levy, Renata Bertazzi; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Preventiva. São Paulo. BR
Rev. saúde pública (Online) ; 54: 42, 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1101857
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To describe students protected by laws and exposed to soft drinks sales and assess whether forbidding laws are associated with lower availability of these beverages. METHODS We identified laws forbidding non-government administered cafeterias or sales of soft drinks in schools in the 27 Brazilian state capitals. Data on soft drinks sales were obtained from Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar 2015 (PeNSE - National Survey of School Health 2015), for a representative sample of 9th graders from public and private schools. Students were attributed with the status of their school regarding the law and sale of soft drinks. Co-variables were school status (public or private), school size, geographic regions, mother's educational level, score of goods and services. We performed multivariate analyses using Poisson regression. RESULTS The total of 23 laws forbidding sales of soft drinks covered 63.0% of capitals, comprising 56.9% of students. Law coverage was higher among students from more developed regions (67.6%) and in public schools (60.6%), compared with those from less developed regions (38.0%) and private schools (45.8%). Soft drinks were available for 33.9% of students. Students attending public schools in less developed regions had the lowest availability of soft drinks, regardless of law coverage (14.8%; 12.0%); while students attending private schools in these regions had a high availability, regardless of law coverage (82.1%; 73.4%). Restrictive laws were associated with lower sales of soft drinks in more developed regions, and restrictions had a greater association with the availability of soft drinks in public schools (PR = 0.25; 95%CI = 0.15-0.41), compared with private schools (PR = 0.48; 95%CI = 0.35-0.66). CONCLUSION Laws restricting soft drinks in schools were associated with fewer sales in more developed regions. Private schools were less compliant with the law than public schools. A broadly enforced national law could reduce the availability of soft drinks in schools.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Schools / Carbonated Beverages / Commerce Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Rev. saúde pública (Online) Journal subject: Sa£de P£blica Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal de Uberlândia/BR / Universidade de São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Schools / Carbonated Beverages / Commerce Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Rev. saúde pública (Online) Journal subject: Sa£de P£blica Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal de Uberlândia/BR / Universidade de São Paulo/BR