Comparação entre práticas relatadas da abordagem do baby-led weaning e a tradicional para a realização da alimentação complementar / Comparison between the reported practices of baby-led weaning and the traditional approach for complementary feeding
Demetra (Rio J.)
;
15(1): e46047, jan.- mar.2020. tab
Article
in English, Portuguese
| LILACS
| ID: biblio-1103667
RESUMO
Comparar as características da alimentação complementar de lactentes cujas mães referiram praticar o baby-led weaning com aquelas que relataram utilização da abordagem tradicional. Métodos:
Estudo quantitativo descritivo com entrevistas online de mães de bebês de 1 a 2 anos, convidadas via redes sociais a preencherem formulário contendo dados socioeconômicos, de aleitamento materno e relativos à alimentação complementar. As diferenças entre os grupos foi verificada por meio dos teste t ou do qui-quadrado.Resultados:
Foram identificadas 208 entrevistadas (57,9%) que relataram usar a abordagem tradicional e 151 (42,1%), o baby-led weaning. Dos bebês em baby-led weaning, 84,1% mantinham-se em aleitamento materno, contra 56,2% em abordagem tradicional, e foram menos expostos a fórmulas, espessantes, mamadeiras e chupetas (p<0,05). Quanto à alimentação complementar, 7,3% do grupo baby-led weaning iniciou antes dos 6 meses, comparados aos 23,1% do grupo abordagem tradicional (p<0,05). Observaram-se diferenças estatisticamente significantes para a idade de introdução da maioria dos grupos de alimentos, para utilização de produtos ultraprocessados, sucos, açúcar e sal. Aqueles em baby-led weaning chegaram, significativamente, aos 12 meses com diferenças quanto a compartilhar a comida da família (71,5% vs 11,5%), sentar-se adequadamente à mesa (89,4% vs 66,8%) e utilizando a consistência adequada dos alimentos (74,2% vs 62,0%).Conclusão:
No presente estudo, lactentes cujas mães relataram realizar o baby-led weaning caracterizaram-se pela introdução de alimentos atendendo às recomendações nacionais comparados àqueles que foram expostos à abordagem tradicional. (AU)ABSTRACT
Objective:
To compare the characteristics of complementary feeding for infants whose mothers reported practising baby-led weaning with those who reported using the traditional approach.Methods:
Quantitative descriptive study with online interviews of mothers of infants aged 1 to 2 years, invited via social net-works to complete a form containing socioeconomic, breastfeeding and com-plementary feeding data. The differences between the groups were verified using t-test or chi-square.Results:
208 respondents (57.9%) were identified who reported using the traditional approach and 151 (42.1%), baby-led wean-ing. Of the babies in the baby-led weaning group, 84.1% were breastfeeding, against 56.2% following the traditional approach; they were also less exposed to formulas, thickeners, bottles and pacifiers (p <0.05). In terms of complemen-tary feeding, 7.3% of the baby-led weaning group initiated this before 6 months compared with 23.1% in the traditional approach group (p <0.05). Statistically significant differences were observed for the age of introduction of most food groups and for the use of ultra-processed foods, juices, sugar and salt. At 12 months those following baby-led weaning were significantly more likely to be sharing family food (71.5% vs 11.5%), to be seated appropriately at the table (89.4% vs 66.8%) and to be eating foods of an appropriate consistency (74.2% vs. 62.0%).Conclusion:
In the present study, infants whose mothers reported following baby-led weaning were more likely to be introduced to food in ac-cordance with national recommendations compared with those who were ex-posed to the traditional approach. (AU)
Full text:
Available
Index:
LILACS (Americas)
Main subject:
Breast Feeding
/
Child Development
/
Maternal Nutrition
Type of study:
Practice guideline
/
Prognostic study
Limits:
Adult
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Infant
/
Male
Language:
English
/
Portuguese
Journal:
Demetra (Rio J.)
Journal subject:
Cincias Humanas
/
Fisiologia
Year:
2020
Type:
Article
Affiliation country:
Brazil
/
United kingdom
Institution/Affiliation country:
Canterbury Christ Church University/GB
/
Universidade de São Paulo/BR
/
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Saúde Pública/BR
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS