Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-benefit analysis of pharmacist interventions over 36 months in a university hospital
Cazarim, Maurilio de Souza; Rodrigues, João Paulo Vilela; Calcini, Priscila Santos; Einarson, Thomas R; Pereira, Leonardo Régis Leira.
  • Cazarim, Maurilio de Souza; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Rodrigues, João Paulo Vilela; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Calcini, Priscila Santos; Universidade de Ribeirão Preto. Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Einarson, Thomas R; University of Toronto. Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy. Toronto. CA
  • Pereira, Leonardo Régis Leira; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto. Ribeirão Preto. BR
Rev. saúde pública (Online) ; 54: 94, 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | BBO, LILACS | ID: biblio-1127253
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To perform a cost-benefits analysis of a clinical pharmacy (CP) service implemented in a Neurology ward of a tertiary teaching hospital.

METHODS:

This is a cost-benefit analysis of a single arm, prospective cohort study performed at the adult Neurology Unit over 36 months, which has evaluated the results of a CP service from a hospital and Public Health System (PHS) perspective. The interventions were classified into 14 categories and the costs identified as direct medical costs. The results were analyzed by the total and marginal cost, the benefit-cost ratio (BCR) and the net benefit (NB).

RESULTS:

The total 334 patients were followed-up and the highest occurrence in 506 interventions was drug introduction (29.0%). The marginal cost for the hospital and avoided cost for PHS was US$182±32 and US$25,536±4,923 per year; and US$0.55 and US$76.4 per patient/year. The BCR and NB were 0.0, -US$26,105 (95%CI −31,850 − -10,610), -US$27,112 (95%CI −33,160-11,720) for the hospital and; 3.0 (95%CI 1.97-4.94), US$51,048 (95%CI 27,645-75,716) and, 4.6 (95%CI 2.24-10.05), US$91,496 (95%CI 34,700-168,050; p < 0.001) for the PHS, both considering adhered and total interventions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The CP service was not directly cost-benefit at the hospital perspective, but it presented savings for forecast cost related to the occurrence of preventable morbidities, measuring a good cost-benefit for the PHS.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Pharmacy Service, Hospital Type of study: Health economic evaluation / Observational study Limits: Adult / Humans Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Rev. saúde pública (Online) Journal subject: Sa£de P£blica Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil / Canada Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de Ribeirão Preto/BR / Universidade de São Paulo/BR / University of Toronto/CA

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Pharmacy Service, Hospital Type of study: Health economic evaluation / Observational study Limits: Adult / Humans Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Rev. saúde pública (Online) Journal subject: Sa£de P£blica Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil / Canada Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de Ribeirão Preto/BR / Universidade de São Paulo/BR / University of Toronto/CA