Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Electric toothbrush for biofilm control in individuals with Down syndrome: a crossover randomized clinical trial
Silva, Aryvelto Miranda; Miranda, Luís Fernando Bandeira; Araújo, Ana Sara Matos; Prado Júnior, Raimundo Rosendo; Mendes, Regina Ferraz.
  • Silva, Aryvelto Miranda; Universidade Federal do Piauí. Postgraduation Program in Dentistry. Teresina. BR
  • Miranda, Luís Fernando Bandeira; Universidade Federal do Piauí. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Teresina. BR
  • Araújo, Ana Sara Matos; Universidade Federal do Piauí. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Teresina. BR
  • Prado Júnior, Raimundo Rosendo; Universidade Federal do Piauí. Postgraduation Program in Dentistry. Teresina. BR
  • Mendes, Regina Ferraz; Universidade Federal do Piauí. Postgraduation Program in Dentistry. Teresina. BR
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 34: e057, 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1132713
ABSTRACT
Abstract Poor oral hygiene seems to be the norm in children and teenagers with Down Syndrome (DS). Advances in design and types of toothbrushes may improve biofilm control. This randomized, single-blind, crossover clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of electric toothbrushes regarding mechanical control of biofilm in children and teenagers with DS and their cooperation. Twenty-nine participants with DS, aged 6 to 14 years, used both types of toothbrushes electric (ET) and manual (MT). The order of use of the different types of toothbrushes was randomly defined, including a 7-day period with each type with 7-day washout period in between. The Turesky-Quigley-Hein biofilm index was used before and after brushing to assess the effectiveness of the technique. Frankl's behavioral scale was used during toothbrushing to assess the participants' cooperation. Paired T-test, Mann Whitney, Chi-square, and Fisher's Exact tests were applied, with a significance level of 5%. The quantity of dental biofilm was significantly reduced after both brushing techniques (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found in total biofilm (ET 0.73 ± 0.36; MT 0.73 ± 0.34; p = 0.985) or % biofilm reduction (ET 72.22%; MT 70.96%; p = 0.762) after brushing between techniques or in % biofilm reduction between toothbrushes of age groups (6 -9 years, p = 0.919; 10-14 years, p = 0.671). Participants showed similar cooperation level with the two types of toothbrush (p = 1.000). The use of electric or manual toothbrush had no effect on the quantity of dental biofilm removed in children and teenagers with DS, nor did it influence their cooperation during the procedure.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Toothbrushing / Down Syndrome / Biofilms / Dental Devices, Home Care / Dental Plaque Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Practice guideline Limits: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Braz. oral res. (Online) Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal do Piauí/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Toothbrushing / Down Syndrome / Biofilms / Dental Devices, Home Care / Dental Plaque Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Practice guideline Limits: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Braz. oral res. (Online) Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal do Piauí/BR