Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surgical treatment of relapsed megaesophagus / Tratamento cirúrgico do megaesôfago recidivado
Costa, Luigi Carlo DA Silva; Braga, João Gabriel Romero; Tercioti Junior, Valdir; Coelho Neto, João DE Souza; Ferrer, José Antônio Possatto; Lopes, Luiz Roberto; Andreollo, Nelson Adami.
  • Costa, Luigi Carlo DA Silva; UNICAMP. Faculty of Medical Sciences. Department of Surgery. Campinas. BR
  • Braga, João Gabriel Romero; UNICAMP. Faculty of Medical Sciences. Department of Surgery. Campinas. BR
  • Tercioti Junior, Valdir; UNICAMP. Faculty of Medical Sciences. Department of Surgery. Campinas. BR
  • Coelho Neto, João DE Souza; UNICAMP. Faculty of Medical Sciences. Department of Surgery. Campinas. BR
  • Ferrer, José Antônio Possatto; UNICAMP. Faculty of Medical Sciences. Department of Surgery. Campinas. BR
  • Lopes, Luiz Roberto; UNICAMP. Faculty of Medical Sciences. Department of Surgery. Campinas. BR
  • Andreollo, Nelson Adami; UNICAMP. Faculty of Medical Sciences. Department of Surgery. Campinas. BR
Rev. Col. Bras. Cir ; 47: e20202444, 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1136548
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Objective:

to analyze the surgical treatment of patients with recurrent megaesophagus followed at the esophageal-stomach-duodenal outpatient clinic of the Hospital de Clínicas - UNICAMP.

Methods:

a retrospective study, from 2011 to 2017, with 26 patients with Chagas or idiopathic megaesophagus, surgically treated, and who recurred with dysphagia. Clinical, endoscopic and radiographic aspects were assessed and correlated with the performed surgical procedures.

Results:

50% had dysphagia for liquids, 69% regurgitation, 65.3% heartburn, 69.2% weight loss and 69.2% had Chagas disease. In addition, 38.4% had megaesophagus stage 1 and 2 and 61.5% stage 3 and 4. Regarding the reoperations, 53% of them underwent Heller-Pinotti surgery by laparoscopy, Serra-Dória in 30.7% and esophageal mucosectomy in 7.9%. In 72% of the reoperations there were no postoperative complications, and 80% of the patients had a good outcome, with reduction or elimination of dysphagia. Among the reoperated patients undergoing the laparoscopic Heller-Pinotti technique, three reported little improvement of dysphagia in the postoperative period and among those who underwent Serra-Dória surgery, 100% had no dysphagia. It was observed that, when the time between the first procedure and the reoperation was longer, the better the surgical result was, with statistical significant decreased dysphagia (p=0.0013, p<0.05).

Conclusions:

there was a preference to perform laparoscopic re-miotomy and, as a second option, Serra-Dória surgery, for patients with recurrent megaesophagus. Esophagectomy or esophageal mucosectomy were reserved for more severe patients.
RESUMO
RESUMO

Objetivo:

analisar o tratamento cirúrgico dos pacientes com megaesôfago recidivado acompanhados no ambulatório de cirurgia de esôfago-estômago-duodeno do Hospital de Clínicas da UNICAMP.

Métodos:

estudo restrospectivo no período de 2011 a 2017, com 26 pacientes portadores de megaesôfago chagásico ou idiopático, tratados cirurgicamente e que evoluíram com recidiva da disfagia. Foram avaliados aspectos clínicos, endoscópicos e radiográficos, sendo correlacionados com os procedimentos cirúrgicos realizados.

Resultados:

50% apresentava disfagia para líquidos, 69% regurgitação, 65,3% pirose, 69,2% perda de peso e 69,2% era chagásico. Além disso, 38,4% apresentavam megaesôfago estágio 1 e 2 e 61,5% estágio 3 e 4. Quanto às reoperações, em 53% foi realizada a cirurgia de Heller-Pinotti videolaparoscópica, seguida de Serra-Dória em 30,7% e mucosectomia esofágica em 7,9%. Em 72% das reoperações não houve complicações pós-operatórias e 80% tiveram evolução satisfatória com redução ou ausência da disfagia. Dentre os pacientes reoperados pela técnica de Heller-Pinotti videolaparoscópica, três referiram pouca melhora da disfagia no pós-operatório. Dentre os pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de Serra-Dória, 100% tiveram evolução satisfatória da disfagia. Foi observado nos pacientes com o tempo entre a primeira cirurgia e a reoperação mais longo, um melhor resultado cirúrgico com diminuição da disfagia, com relevância estatística (p=0,0013, p<0,05).

Conclusão:

houve preferência nas reoperações de megaesôfago pela realização de re-miotomia por videolaparoscopia e, como segunda opção, a cirurgia de Serra-Dória. A esofagectomia ou mucosectomia esofágica foram reservadas para os casos mais avançados.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Esophageal Achalasia / Esophagectomy / Laparoscopy Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Rev. Col. Bras. Cir Journal subject: General Surgery Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: UNICAMP/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Esophageal Achalasia / Esophagectomy / Laparoscopy Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Rev. Col. Bras. Cir Journal subject: General Surgery Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: UNICAMP/BR