Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review
Andreotti, Ezequiel T.; Ipuchima, Jaqueline R.; Cazella, Silvio César; Beria, Pedro; Bortoncello, Cristiane Flôres; Silveira, Richard Chuquel; Ferrão, Ygor Arzeno.
  • Andreotti, Ezequiel T.; Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Ipuchima, Jaqueline R.; Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Cazella, Silvio César; Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Beria, Pedro; Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Bortoncello, Cristiane Flôres; Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Silveira, Richard Chuquel; Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Ferrão, Ygor Arzeno; Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre. BR
Trends psychiatry psychother. (Impr.) ; 42(3): 276-281, July-Sept. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1139831
ABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction Suicide is an issue of great severity in public health worldwide. This study aimed to investigate which instruments are most frequently used by healthcare professionals to assess suicide risk and how accessible such instruments are, as well as to determine the scope of suicide phenomena. Method A systematic review was performed using the following Boolean searches "scale AND suicide," "evaluation AND suicide," "questionnaire AND suicide." The articles retrieved were read and selected by two independent researchers - any discrepancies were addressed by a third researcher. Results From a total number of 206 articles, 20 instruments were identified as being currently used to assess suicide risk. The two most common were the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSI) and The Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Conclusion Even though the two scales (BSI and C-SSRS) are the most frequently mentioned and used by healthcare professionals to assess suicide risk, both instruments present breaches in their structure and there is not yet a single instrument considered to be the gold standard. As a future perspective, there is the urgency of developing a new tool that can widely and completely assess all psychopathological aspects of suicidality.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / Suicide / Risk Assessment Type of study: Etiology study / Risk factors / Systematic reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Trends psychiatry psychother. (Impr.) Journal subject: Psychiatry Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / Suicide / Risk Assessment Type of study: Etiology study / Risk factors / Systematic reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Trends psychiatry psychother. (Impr.) Journal subject: Psychiatry Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre/BR