Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prognosis of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Primary Care by the H2FPEF Score
Jorge, Antonio Jose Lagoeiro; Rosa, Maria Luiza Garcia; Martins, Wolney de Andrade; Leite, Adson; Correia, Dayse Mary da Silva; Saad, Maria Auxiliadora Nogueira; Villacorta, Humberto; Chermont, Sergio; Gismondi, Ronaldo Altenburg; Almeida, Breno Macedo; Mesquita, Evandro Tinoco.
  • Jorge, Antonio Jose Lagoeiro; Universidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói. BR
  • Rosa, Maria Luiza Garcia; Universidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói. BR
  • Martins, Wolney de Andrade; Universidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói. BR
  • Leite, Adson; Universidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói. BR
  • Correia, Dayse Mary da Silva; Universidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói. BR
  • Saad, Maria Auxiliadora Nogueira; Universidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói. BR
  • Villacorta, Humberto; Universidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói. BR
  • Chermont, Sergio; Universidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói. BR
  • Gismondi, Ronaldo Altenburg; Universidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói. BR
  • Almeida, Breno Macedo; Universidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói. BR
  • Mesquita, Evandro Tinoco; Universidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói. BR
Int. j. cardiovasc. sci. (Impr.) ; 33(6): 666-672, Nov.-Dec. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1143118
ABSTRACT
Abstract

Background:

Primary care physicians have difficulty dealing with patients who have HF with preserved LVEF(HFpEF). The prognosis of HFpEF is poor, and difficult to predict on primary care.

Objective:

The aim of the study is to apply the H2FPEF score to primary care patients and verify its power to assess the risk of death or hospitalization due to cardiovascular disease.

Methods:

This longitudinal study included 402 individuals, with signs or symptoms of HF, aged≥45 years and, underwent an evaluation which included clinical examination, BNP and echocardiogram. The diagnosis of HFpEF was confirmed by the criteria of the European Society of Cardiology. After five years, the patients were reassessed as to the occurrence of the composite outcome, death from any cause or hospitalization for cardiovascular disease. H2FPEF used six variables body mass index, medications for hypertension, age, pulmonary artery systolic pressure, atrial fibrillation and E/e' ratio ranged from 0 to 9 points. The level of statistical significance was p<0.05.

Results:

HFpEF was diagnosed in 58(14.4%). Among patients with H2FPEF≥4, 30% had HFpEF and in those with a score≤4, HFpEF was present in 12%. Patients with HFpEF and H2FPEF≥4 had 53% of outcomes, whereas patients with HFpEF and a score ≤4 had a 21% of outcomes. BNP values were higher in patients with HFpEF compared to those without HFpEF(p<0.0001).

Conclusion:

H2FPEF≥4 indicated a worse prognosis in patients with HFpEF assisted in primary care. H2FPEF may be a simple and useful tool for risk stratification in patients with HFpEF at the primary care.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Primary Health Care / Heart Failure, Diastolic Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. j. cardiovasc. sci. (Impr.) Journal subject: Cardiology Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal Fluminense/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Primary Health Care / Heart Failure, Diastolic Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. j. cardiovasc. sci. (Impr.) Journal subject: Cardiology Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal Fluminense/BR