Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Análisis de concordancia entre trazado cefalométrico manual y cefalométrico digital con programa Nemoceph / Analysis of concordance between manual cephalometric and digital cephalometric tracing with Nemoceph program
Aguilar Hernández, Mariana; De Alba Cruz, Israel.
  • Aguilar Hernández, Mariana; CINEO - Instituto de Educación y Desarrollo Profesional en Odontología. MX
  • De Alba Cruz, Israel; CINEO - Instituto de Educación y Desarrollo Profesional en Odontología. MX
Rev. ADM ; 77(5): 244-246, sept.-oct. 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1146798
RESUMEN
La importancia del análisis cefalométrico dentro del diagnóstico en ortodoncia ha ido incrementando a través de los años, por ello, el interés de comparar la confiabilidad de los sistemas digitales con el trazado manual convencional.

Objetivo:

Definir el grado de concordancia entre los resultados de trazado cefalométrico manual y con Nemoceph. Material y

métodos:

Se utilizaron ocho medidas lineales y angulares del análisis cefalométrico de Steiner. Se realizó un estudio transversal, correlacional, en el cual se analizaron 70 radiografías laterales de cráneo digitales. Los resultados se dividieron en dos grupos, trazado manual y trazado cefalométrico con Nemoceph, los cuales fueron evaluados con un índice de correlación intraclase.

Conclusión:

Se reportó un grado de correlación intraclase mayor a 0.75, estableciendo que el sistema digital exhibe la misma precisión del manual, con algunas ventajas convenientes a la época (AU)
ABSTRACT
The importance taken by the cephalometric analysis within the orthodontic diagnosis has been increasing over the years, for that reason the interest of comparing the reliability of the digital systems with the conventional manual tracing.

Objective:

To define the degree of concordance between the results of manual cephalometric tracing and with Nemoceph. Material and

methods:

Eight linear and angular measurements of Steiner's cephalometric analysis were used. A crosssectional, correlational study was conducted in which 70 digital skull lateral radiographs were analyzed. The results were divided into two groups; manual tracing and cephalometric tracing with Nemoceph, which were evaluated with an intraclass correlation index.

Conclusion:

a correlation degree greater than 0.75 was reported. Establishing that the digital system exhibits the same precision of the manual, with some advantages suited to the age (AU)
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Cephalometry / Radiography, Dental, Digital / Malocclusion Type of study: Practice guideline / Observational study / Prevalence study / Risk factors Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Mexico Language: Spanish Journal: Rev. ADM Journal subject: Dentistry / Orthodontics Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Mexico Institution/Affiliation country: CINEO - Instituto de Educación y Desarrollo Profesional en Odontología/MX

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Cephalometry / Radiography, Dental, Digital / Malocclusion Type of study: Practice guideline / Observational study / Prevalence study / Risk factors Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Mexico Language: Spanish Journal: Rev. ADM Journal subject: Dentistry / Orthodontics Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Mexico Institution/Affiliation country: CINEO - Instituto de Educación y Desarrollo Profesional en Odontología/MX