Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incidence of condylar resorption after bimaxillary, Lefort I, and mandibular surgery: an overview
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryNIÑO-SANDOVAL, Tania Camila; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryALMEIDA, Renata de Albuquerque Cavalcanti; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryVASCONCELOS, Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito.
  • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryNIÑO-SANDOVAL, Tania Camila; Universidade de Pernambuco. School of Dentistry. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryNIÑO-SANDOVAL, Tania Camila. Recife. BR
  • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryALMEIDA, Renata de Albuquerque Cavalcanti; Universidade de Pernambuco. School of Dentistry. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryALMEIDA, Renata de Albuquerque Cavalcanti. Recife. BR
  • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryVASCONCELOS, Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito; Universidade de Pernambuco. School of Dentistry. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryVASCONCELOS, Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito. Recife. BR
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 35: e27, 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1153614
ABSTRACT
Abstract The aim of the present overview was to evaluate the outcomes of systematic reviews to determine the incidence of condylar resorption in patients submitted to orthognathic surgery and analyze whether the risk of developing this condition is related to a specific type of surgery. Searches were conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases for systematic reviews with quantitative data on condylar resorption due to any type of orthognathic surgery for dentoskeletal deformities published up to May 25, 2019. The AMSTAR 2 and Glenny tools were applied for the quality appraisal. Five systematic reviews were included for analysis. Only one article was considered to have high quality. Among a total of 5128 patients, 12.32% developed condylar resorption. From those patients, 70.1% had double jaw surgery, 23.4% had mandibular surgery alone, and in 6.5% a Lefort I technique was used. Based on these findings, bimaxillary surgery could be considered a risk factor for condylar resorption. However, these results should be interpreted with caution, since other factors, such as pre-operative skeletal deformities, type of movement, and type of fixation, can contribute to the development of this condition. Further studies should consider reporting main cephalometric data, temporomandibular diagnosis, hormonal levels, and tomographic measures before and after the surgery at least every 6 months during the firsts two years to identify accurately risk factors for condylar resorption.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Bone Resorption / Orthognathic Surgical Procedures Type of study: Incidence study / Overview / Prognostic study / Risk factors / Systematic reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Braz. oral res. (Online) Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de Pernambuco/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Bone Resorption / Orthognathic Surgical Procedures Type of study: Incidence study / Overview / Prognostic study / Risk factors / Systematic reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Braz. oral res. (Online) Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de Pernambuco/BR