Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In vitro study of marginal, internal and proximal adaptation of implant-supported single-crown CAD/CAM restorations
Alves, Kamila Aguiar Figueiredo; Damasceno, Janaina Emanuela; Oliveira, Viviane Maia Barreto de; Bastos, Luiz Gustavo Cavalcant; Cavalcanti, Andrea Nóbrega.
  • Alves, Kamila Aguiar Figueiredo; School of Medicine and Public Health of Bahia (BAHIANA). Salvador. BR
  • Damasceno, Janaina Emanuela; University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Piracicaba. BR
  • Oliveira, Viviane Maia Barreto de; School of Medicine and Public Health of Bahia (BAHIANA). Salvador. BR
  • Bastos, Luiz Gustavo Cavalcant; School of Medicine and Public Health of Bahia (BAHIANA). Federal University of Bahia (FOUFBA). Salvador. BR
  • Cavalcanti, Andrea Nóbrega; School of Medicine and Public Health of Bahia (BAHIANA). Federal University of Bahia (FOUFBA). Salvador. BR
Braz. j. oral sci ; 19: e207286, jan.-dez. 2020. ilus
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1177175
ABSTRACT

Aim:

This study evaluated the precision of a CAD/CAM system by measuring marginal, internal and proximal fits in implant-supported single-crown restorations.

Methods:

Ten models of the upper arch were made in which implants replaced the upper left premolars. For fabrication of the zirconia infrastructures, titanium bases (TiBase) were coded and scanned using a scan body. A second digital impression was made for the fabrication of prostheses. Silicone impression material was used to determine the internal clearance between the TiBase and infrastructure and between the infrastructure and crown, whose thickness was measured at three points [P1 (cervical), P2 (middle) and P3 (occlusal)] with a stereoscopic microscope at 70x and 100x magnification. One-way ANOVA for repeated measures and the Student t-test were used for the analysis of internal and marginal adaptation. Proximal contacts were analyzed qualitatively.

Results:

There was no significant difference between the teeth evaluated (Student's t-test; p>0.05) or between the corresponding points evaluated in either tooth (one-way ANOVA; p>0.05). Analysis of the internal clearance between the infrastructure and crown demonstrated that all points were significantly different compared to the reference standardized at 100 µm (Student's t-test p<0.0001). There was no significant difference between P1 and P2, with the thickness at these two points being lower than that obtained at P3 (one-way ANOVA, p<0.05). The proximal contacts did not coincide with the quality defined by the device.

Conclusion:

The system tested was unable to produce implant-supported single-crown ceramic restorations with marginal, internal and proximal fits matching the digital workflow, with the inferior fits requiring adjustment prior to cementation
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Ceramics / Computer-Aided Design / Crowns / Data Accuracy Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: School of Medicine and Public Health of Bahia (BAHIANA)/BR / University of Campinas/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Ceramics / Computer-Aided Design / Crowns / Data Accuracy Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: School of Medicine and Public Health of Bahia (BAHIANA)/BR / University of Campinas/BR