Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the quality of referral letters: experience of a Brazilian oral medicine service
Department of Oral DiagnosisRodrigues, Camila Real Delegá; Department of Oral DiagnosisFernandes, Patrícia Maria; Department of Oral DiagnosisSantos-Silva, Alan Roger; Department of Oral DiagnosisVargas, Pablo Agustin; Department of Oral DiagnosisLopes, Marcio Ajudarte.
  • Department of Oral DiagnosisRodrigues, Camila Real Delegá; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Oral DiagnosisRodrigues, Camila Real Delegá. Piracicaba. BR
  • Department of Oral DiagnosisFernandes, Patrícia Maria; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Oral DiagnosisFernandes, Patrícia Maria. Piracicaba. BR
  • Department of Oral DiagnosisSantos-Silva, Alan Roger; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Oral DiagnosisSantos-Silva, Alan Roger. Piracicaba. BR
  • Department of Oral DiagnosisVargas, Pablo Agustin; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Oral DiagnosisVargas, Pablo Agustin. Piracicaba. BR
  • Department of Oral DiagnosisLopes, Marcio Ajudarte; Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Oral DiagnosisLopes, Marcio Ajudarte. Piracicaba. BR
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 35: e037, 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1249371
ABSTRACT
Abstract Optimizing the quality of referral letters could be the first step to a correct clinical approach for patients. Referral letters should be legible and contain the necessary information to avoid delaying the patient's diagnosis and treatment. However, to date, few studies have been conducted on how referrals are performed in Brazil. Knowledge regarding the quality of referral letters can provide information to better guide health care professionals. This study was aimed at analyzing all referrals received by a single oral medicine service in Brazil. Referral letters were classified into poor, regular, good, and excellent based on key items concerning the primary morphology of the lesion, location, diagnostic hypothesis, symptomatology, time of evolution, consistency, size, and limits. A total of 500 referral letters were evaluated, including 271 (54.2%) from a private service and 229 (45.8%) from a public service. Dentists and physicians had written 475 (95%) and 25 (5%) referral letters, respectively. Among the 500 referrals analyzed in this study, the number of regular, poor, good, and excellent referrals was 236 (47.2%), 203 (40.6%), 58 (11.6%), and one (0.6%), respectively, showing a lack of important clinical information in referrals.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Referral and Consultation / Oral Medicine Type of study: Evaluation studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Braz. oral res. (Online) Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Estadual de Campinas/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Referral and Consultation / Oral Medicine Type of study: Evaluation studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Braz. oral res. (Online) Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Estadual de Campinas/BR