Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of rt-pcr test false-negative results for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in Mexico
Núñez, Isaac; Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F.; Caro-Vega, Yanink.
  • Núñez, Isaac; Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán. Department of Internal Medicine. Mexico City. MX
  • Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F.; National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Maryland. US
  • Caro-Vega, Yanink; Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán. Department of Infectious Diseases. Mexico City. MX
Rev. invest. clín ; 73(2): 120-126, Mar.-Apr. 2021. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1251872
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Background:

Underestimation of the number of cases during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a constant concern worldwide. Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA using real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the most common method to confirm a case. However, these tests have suboptimal sensitivity.

Objective:

The objective of the study was to estimate the number of COVID-19 confirmed cases, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and deaths in Mexico, accounting for the probabilities of false-negative tests.

Methods:

We used publicly available, national databases of all SARS-CoV-2 tests performed at public laboratories in Mexico between February 27 and October 31, 2020. We used the estimated probabilities of false-negative tests based on the day of clinical sample collection after symptom initiation calculated previously. With the resulting model, we estimated the corrected daily number of cases, ICU admissions, and deaths.

Results:

Among 2,024,822 people tested in Mexico between February 27 and October 31 with an available result, we estimated 1,248,583 (95% confidence interval 1,094,850-1,572,818) cases, compared to 902,343 cases reported with positive tests. ICU admissions and deaths were 15% and 8% higher than reported, respectively.

Conclusion:

Accounting for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-based diagnostic testsҠprecision is a simple way to improve estimations for the true number of COVID-19 cases among tested persons.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: COVID-19 Testing / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study / Screening study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Mexico Language: English Journal: Rev. invest. clín Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Mexico / United States Institution/Affiliation country: Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán/MX / National Institutes of Health/US

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: COVID-19 Testing / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study / Screening study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Mexico Language: English Journal: Rev. invest. clín Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Mexico / United States Institution/Affiliation country: Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán/MX / National Institutes of Health/US