Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mixed-methods evaluation of family medicine research training and peer mentorship in Lesotho
Mcguire, Chelsea M; Riffenburg, Katherine; Malope, Sebaka; Jack, Brian; Borba, Christina P. C.
  • Mcguire, Chelsea M; s.af
  • Riffenburg, Katherine; s.af
  • Malope, Sebaka; s.af
  • Jack, Brian; s.af
  • Borba, Christina P. C; s.af
Article in English | AIM | ID: biblio-1257741
ABSTRACT

Background:

Strengthening primary care research capacity is a priority globally. Family medicine training programmes in sub-Saharan Africa represent an important opportunity to build primary care research; however, they are often limited by insufficient research training and mentorship. Peers can be used to extend research mentorship capacity, but have not been evaluated in this context.

Aim:

The aim of this study was to evaluate one family medicine training programme's research capacity building efforts through a blended research curriculum and peer mentorship.

Setting:

Lesotho is a landlocked country within South Africa of approximately two million people. The Family Medicine Specialty Training Programme (FMSTP) is the only accredited postgraduate medical education programme in Lesotho.

Methods:

This two-year mixed-methods evaluation used (1) Likert-scale surveys measuring trainee research confidence, (2) written evaluations by trainees, peers, programme faculty and administrators and (3) in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Survey data were analysed using Friedman and sign tests. Interview and written data were analysed thematically via a mixed inductive-deductive approach using Cooke's framework.

Results:

Family Medicine Specialty Training Programme trainees (n = 8) experienced moderate increases in research confidence that were statistically significant. Skill-building occurred primarily via experiential learning. Research was grounded in trainees' clinical practice and locally relevant. A positive research culture was created, promising for sustainability. We identified infrastructure gaps, including funding and protected time. Peer research mentorship supported trainees' motivation and provided a safe space for questions.

Conclusion:

The FMSTP research curriculum and peer mentorship programme were successful in positively impacting a number of Cooke's research capacity domains. This evaluation identified improvements that are now being implemented
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Index: AIM (Africa) Main subject: Primary Health Care / Research / Family Practice / Peer Influence / Lesotho Type of study: Qualitative research Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: English Journal: Afr. j. prim. health care fam. med. (Online) Year: 2020 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Search on Google
Index: AIM (Africa) Main subject: Primary Health Care / Research / Family Practice / Peer Influence / Lesotho Type of study: Qualitative research Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: English Journal: Afr. j. prim. health care fam. med. (Online) Year: 2020 Type: Article