The Impact of preservation of the prostatic apex on the urodynamic characteristics in different orthotopic ileal reservoirs

ABSTRACT

Objective This study was carried out to evaluate the urodynamic characteristics of the Camey II; Kock's and W-configured ileal reservoirs utilized for orthotopic urinary diversion. Patients and Methods Between January 2000 and 2002; 42 male patients prospectively underwent radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer followed by orthotopic urinary diversion at the urology department of Cairo University hospitals. All cases were evaluated clinically; bacteriologically; radiologically and urodynamically including uroflowmetry; medium-fill and voiding enterocystometry and urethral pressure profilometry; which was done in the early and late postoperative period (at 3-6 months and 6-18 months). Patients were divided into four groups Group I 11 cases with preservation of the prostatic apex and creation of a W-neobladder. Group II 11 cases without prostatic apex preservation and creation of a W-shaped ileal pouch. Group III 12 cases without prostatic apex preservation and creation of a Camey II pouch. Group IV 8 cases without prostatic apex preservation and creation of a Kock's pouch. Results The patients of Group I had a larger mean neobladder capacity (699 ml) and volume at which the first contraction occurred (315 ml) and a larger amount of residual urine (224 ml) as compared to Group II (511.1; 285 and 77.5 ml; respectively); Group III (375; 200 and 55 ml; respectively) and Group IV (563; 266 and 600 ml; respectively). Also Group I with a preserved prostatic apex had a higher mean intraluminal opening pressure (55 cm H2O) and a higher pressure at maximum flow (62.36 cm H20) as compared to the patients with complete prostatic resection. Conclusion We conclude that the patients with a preserved prostatic apex (Group I) had a statistically significant higher mean residual urine in the early and late postoperative period and a significantly higher mean maximum cystometric capacity in the late postoperative period as compared to those recorded in patients with complete prostatic resection (Groups II; III; IV). A higher incidence of upper tract deterioration was detected in Group I (35) vs. 4.6; 27.8and 12.5in Groups II; III and IV; respectively