Tratamiento de hematoma subdural: comparación entre drenaje subdural a presión negativa contra otro tipo de drenajes / Treatment of subdural hematoma: comparative analysis between subdural drainage with negative pressure versus other drainages

RESUMEN

La ultrasonografía es un método de evaluación rápido y eficaz en los departamentos de emergencias, siempre en manos entrenadas. La lesión vascular periférica es un cuadro que en lo que trauma se refiere, debe tener un veloz diagnóstico y tratamiento por los riesgos que significa En lesiones abiertas, la hemorragia; y en lesiones cerradas se añade el síndrome compartimental. Lograr la evaluación de la indemnidad o no del árbol vascular en los miembros, se torna importante a la hora de prevenir eventos que requieran intervención quirúrgica (reparación y/o fasciotomía). El objetivo de este trabajo consiste en demostrar la utilidad del conocimiento del árbol vascular periférico y su evaluación mediante doppler para el manejo del trauma vascular periférico, mental (n=77) = 11 (14,78 %). Resolución lesión vascular = 1 (1,3 %) síndrome compartimental= 1 (1,3 %) con resolución quirúrgica. La utilización de la ultrasonografía y del doppler para la evaluación vascular periférica es útil para el reconocimiento precoz del riesgo a desarrollar desde una lesión vascular simple hasta un síndrome compartimental. La utilización de listas de verificación durante la simulación para la generación del criterio, son útiles en la formación de residentes de cirugía

ABSTRACT

Report the recurrence rate ofnegative pressure subdural drainage (NPSD) versusto other kind of drains (OD). Design and Methods: Astudy was conducted cross-sectional and weretrospectively analyzed on the database of theneurosurgical service and we looked for all surgicalprocedures recorded from January 2006 to December2015. Procedures with preoperative diagnosis ofsubdural hematoma (SDH) were selected, with a to-tal of 364 interventions, were excluded patients withpostoperative diagnosis different from SDH andeliminated those who did not have complete data,recurrence was identified, a statistical analysis wasperformed describing frequency measurementspercentage and standard deviation, RM and chi-square was obtained by software EPIDAT 3.1. 277 surgeries were performed in 230 patients, Thepopulation was divided into two groups the first thoseinterventions with negative pressure subduraldrainage versus a second group with other differentdrains, and finally we compared the recurrence ratein each group, 44 surgeries had recurrence of SDH.The proportion of recurrence was found 16 % of thesurgeries, 16 % (n=7) of these were performed withnegative pressure subdural drainage and theremaining 84 % (n=37) by other drainage. The reasonfor prevalence found was 0.36 (95 % CI , 0.15 to0.85), with statistically significant differences (p =0.0165). The chi-square was 5.75 for the SDH withNPSD. It was found that patients treated with NPSDhave a lower risk of recurrence compared with OD,which acts as a protective factor for patients treatedwith this type of drain, this is statistically significant.