Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cortical plasticity following intramuscular lidocaine injection / Injeção intramuscular de lidocaína e plasticidade cortical
Valente, Julie Azevedo Araújo; Camatti, Janine Ribeiro; Ramalho, Maria José; Oliveira, Iasmyn Adélia Victor Fernandes de; Hazime, Fuad Ahmad; Baptista, Abrahão Fontes.
  • Valente, Julie Azevedo Araújo; Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health. Salvador. BR
  • Camatti, Janine Ribeiro; Federal University of ABC. Graduate Program on Neuroscience and Cognition. São Bernardo do Campo. BR
  • Ramalho, Maria José; São Rafael Hospital. Anesthesiology Department. Salvador. BR
  • Oliveira, Iasmyn Adélia Victor Fernandes de; Federal University of Bahia. Graduate Program on Medicine and Health. Salvador. BR
  • Hazime, Fuad Ahmad; Federal University of Piaui. Department of Physiotherapy. Salvador. BR
  • Baptista, Abrahão Fontes; Federal University of ABC. Graduate Program on Neuroscience and Cognition. São Bernardo do Campo. BR
BrJP ; 4(2): 119-123, June 2021. graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1285493
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

The manipulation of peripheral neuronal activity can alter the excitability of the primary motor cortex; however, it is not known whether this occurs after intramuscular injections of lidocaine. Therefore, the investigation focused on neurophysiological changes, assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation, after lidocaine (0.5mL, 2%) injection in the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the dominant hand of healthy individuals.

METHODS:

Exploratory, double-blind, parallel laboratory study. Twenty-eight healthy subjects (mean age 29.6 years, 15 women). Measurements with transcranial magnetic stimulation included resting motor threshold, motor evoked potential, intracortical facilitation, and short intracortical inhibition. Lidocaine injection (LID group) was compared to dry needling (DRY group), saline injection (SAL group), and no intervention (CTL group). Participants were randomly placed in each group. Muscle strength and measures of peripheral excitability (rheobase and chronaxie) were also evaluated to detect whether the interventions generated changes in the peripheral neuromuscular excitability. Evaluations were performed over four time points immediately before and after intervention and 30 and 60 minutes after intervention.

RESULTS:

A generalized linear model was used to identify differences between the LID, DRY, and SAL groups and the CTL group. The results showed that motor evoked potentials were modified in the LID group (p<0.005).

CONCLUSION:

The injection of lidocaine into the first dorsal interosseous muscle in the dominant hand of healthy adults alters motor evoked potentials.
RESUMO
RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E

OBJETIVOS:

A manipulação da atividade neuronal periférica pode alterar a excitabilidade do córtex motor primário; entretanto, não se sabe se esse fenômeno ocorre após a injeção intramuscular de lidocaína. Investigaram-se alterações eletrofisiológicas através de estimulação magnética transcraniana após injeção de lidocaína (0,5mL, 2%) no músculo primeiro interósseo dorsal da mão dominante de indivíduos saudáveis.

MÉTODOS:

Estudo paralelo, exploratório, duplo-cego, realizado em laboratório. Vinte e oito voluntários saudáveis (idade média 29,6 anos, 15 mulheres). Foram avaliados através de estimulação magnética transcraniana no limiar motor de repouso, potencial evocado motor, facilitação intracortical e inibição intracortical. A injeção de lidocaína (grupo LID) foi comparada com agulhamento a seco (grupo DRY), injeção de solução salina (grupo SAL) e nenhuma intervenção (grupo CTL). Os participantes foram distribuídos randomicamente em cada grupo. Força muscular e medidas de excitabilidade periférica (reobase e cronaxia) foram também estudadas. As avaliações ocorreram em quatro momentos imediatamente antes e após a intervenção e 30 e 60 minutos após a intervenção.

RESULTADOS:

Foi utilizado modelo linear generalizado para identificar as diferenças entre os grupos LID, DRY, SAL e CTL. Os resultados mostraram que o potencial evocado motor foi modificado no grupo LID (p<0,005).

CONCLUSÃO:

Em indivíduos saudáveis, a injeção de lidocaína intramuscular pode alterar o potencial evocado motor.


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Controlled clinical trial Language: English Journal: BrJP Journal subject: Medicina Cl¡nica / Medicina Interna / Patologia Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health/BR / Federal University of ABC/BR / Federal University of Bahia/BR / Federal University of Piaui/BR / São Rafael Hospital/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Controlled clinical trial Language: English Journal: BrJP Journal subject: Medicina Cl¡nica / Medicina Interna / Patologia Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health/BR / Federal University of ABC/BR / Federal University of Bahia/BR / Federal University of Piaui/BR / São Rafael Hospital/BR