Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Symptoms, Signs, and Presence of Pepsin in Saliva - A Reliable Diagnostic Triad
Divakaran, Shilpa; Rajendran, Sivaa; Thomas, Roshan Marie; Jacob, Jaise; Kurien, Mary.
  • Divakaran, Shilpa; NMC Specialty Hospital. Department of ENT. Muscat. OM
  • Rajendran, Sivaa; Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences. Department of Biochemistry. Kalapet. IN
  • Thomas, Roshan Marie; City Hospital. Department of ENT. Kochi. IN
  • Jacob, Jaise; Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences. Department of Biochemistry. Kalapet. IN
  • Kurien, Mary; Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences. Department of Biochemistry. Kalapet. IN
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 25(2): 273-278, Apr.-June 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1286747
ABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction Twenty-four-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance with double probe pH monitoring (MII-pH), though considered the most sensitive tool for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), is invasive, time consuming, not widely available, and unable to detect non-acid reflux. In contrast, the presence of pepsin in the saliva would act as a marker for reflux, considering that pepsin is only produced in the stomach. Objective To evaluate the predictive value of salivary pepsin in diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) as suggested by the results of reflux symptom index (RSI > 13), reflux finding score (RFS > 7), and positive response to treatment with a 4-week course of proton-pump inhibitors. Methods This prospective study was done at a tertiary care hospital on 120 adult patients attending ENT OPD with clinical diagnosis of LPR. The presence of pepsin in their pharyngeal secretions and saliva using a lateral flow device, the Peptest, was compared with RSI, RFS, and with the response to medical treatment using the Chi-squared test. Results Salivary pepsin was found to be positive in 68% of the patients, with 87.5% of them showing positive response to treatment. Chi-squared analysis showed a significant association between positive salivary pepsin and RFS > 7, RSI >13, a combination of RFS > 7 and RSI > 13 as well as with response to treatment (p < 0.0001). Conclusion When considered along with the clinical indicators of RFS and RSI of more than 7 and 13, respectively, and/or with a response to treatment, a positive salivary pepsin test indicates statistically significant chance of presence of LPR.


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Language: English Journal: Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) Journal subject: Otolaryngology Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: India / Oman Institution/Affiliation country: City Hospital/IN / NMC Specialty Hospital/OM / Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences/IN

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Language: English Journal: Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) Journal subject: Otolaryngology Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: India / Oman Institution/Affiliation country: City Hospital/IN / NMC Specialty Hospital/OM / Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences/IN