Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mepolizumab in hypereosinophilic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Alves Júnior, José Mario; Prota, Francisco Eduardo; Villagelin, Danilo; Bley, Fernanda; Bernardo, Wanderley Marques.
  • Alves Júnior, José Mario; Unimed Campinas Cooperativa de Trabalho Medico - Gestao e Valor em Saude. Campinas. BR
  • Prota, Francisco Eduardo; Unimed Campinas Cooperativa de Trabalho Medico - Gestao e Valor em Saude. Campinas. BR
  • Villagelin, Danilo; Unimed Campinas Cooperativa de Trabalho Medico - Gestao e Valor em Saude. Campinas. BR
  • Bley, Fernanda; Ebenezer Gestao em Saude - Medicina Baseada em Evidencia. Sao Paulo. BR
  • Bernardo, Wanderley Marques; Ebenezer Gestao em Saude - Medicina Baseada em Evidencia. Sao Paulo. BR
Clinics ; 76: e3271, 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1339708
ABSTRACT
We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab (MEP) in the management of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). A systematic search was performed, and articles published until March 2021 were analyzed. The primary efficacy results evaluated were hospitalization rate related to HES, morbidity (new or worsening), relapses/failure, treatment-related adverse effects, prednisone dosage ≤10 mg/day for ≥8 weeks, and eosinophil count <600/μL for ≥8 weeks. A meta-analysis was conducted, when appropriate. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with a total of 255 patients, were included. The studies contemplated the use of MEP 300 mg/SC or 750 mg/IV. According to the evaluation of the proposed outcomes, when relapse rates/therapeutic failures were assessed, there was a 26% reduction with MEP 300 mg/SC (RD=-0.26; 95% CI -0.44 to -0.08; p=0.04) and 48% reduction with MEP 750 mg/IV (RD=-0.48; 95% CI -0.67, -0.30; p<0.00001). For the outcomes, prednisone dosage ≤10 mg/day for ≥8 weeks was 48% (RD=0.48; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.62; p<0.00001), and the eosinophil count <600/μL for ≥8 weeks was 51% (RD=0.51; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.63; p<0.00001), both showed a reduction with MEP 300 mg/IV and 750 mg/IV. No statistically significant differences in treatment-related adverse effects outcomes were observed for either dosage (RD=0.09; 95% CI -0.05 to 0.24; p=0.20; RD=0.09; 95% CI -0.11 to 0.29; p=0.39). Despite the positive effects observed for the studied outcomes, the exact significance remains unclear.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Hypereosinophilic Syndrome / Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Systematic reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Clinics Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Ebenezer Gestao em Saude - Medicina Baseada em Evidencia/BR / Unimed Campinas Cooperativa de Trabalho Medico - Gestao e Valor em Saude/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Hypereosinophilic Syndrome / Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Systematic reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Clinics Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Ebenezer Gestao em Saude - Medicina Baseada em Evidencia/BR / Unimed Campinas Cooperativa de Trabalho Medico - Gestao e Valor em Saude/BR