Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using a professional DSLR camera to measure total shrinkage of resin composites
SILVA, Julyana Dumas Santos; FREITAS, Lorena Aparecida Santos de; SILVA, Vitória Ariella Silveira e; FIRMIANO, Tainah Costa; TANTBIROJN, Daranee; VERSLUIS, Antheunis; VERÍSSIMO, Crisnicaw.
  • SILVA, Julyana Dumas Santos; Universidade Federal de Goiás. School of Dentistry. Department of Oral Rehabilitation. Goiania. BR
  • FREITAS, Lorena Aparecida Santos de; Universidade Federal de Goiás. School of Dentistry. Department of Oral Rehabilitation. Goiania. BR
  • SILVA, Vitória Ariella Silveira e; Universidade Federal de Goiás. School of Dentistry. Department of Oral Rehabilitation. Goiania. BR
  • FIRMIANO, Tainah Costa; Universidade Federal de Goiás. School of Dentistry. Department of Oral Rehabilitation. Goiania. BR
  • TANTBIROJN, Daranee; University of Tennessee. Health Science Center. College of Dentistry. Memphis. US
  • VERSLUIS, Antheunis; University of Tennessee. Health Science Center. College of Dentistry. Memphis. US
  • VERÍSSIMO, Crisnicaw; Universidade Federal de Goiás. School of Dentistry. Department of Oral Rehabilitation. Goiania. BR
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 36: e009, 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1355929
ABSTRACT
Abstract This study evaluated the optical method for measuring free total shrinkage using a Digital Single Lens Reflex (DSLR) camera. Eight composites were evaluated, conventional, bulk fill and low-shrinkage Z100 (3M Oral Care), Gradia Direct Anterior (GC corporation), Spectra Smart (Dentsply), Filtek Z350 XT (3M Oral Care), Aura Bulk Fill (SDI), Vittra APS (FGM), Opus Bulk Fill APS (FGM), and Beautifil II LS (Shofu Inc.). The samples (6 mm diameter and 1.5 mm thick, n = 10) were placed on a polyvinylsiloxane impression material. An image of the uncured sample was captured using a DSLR camera with 105 mm macro lens and a ring flash. Samples were light cured with a 700 mW/cm2 LED light-cure unit for 40s. Post-polymerization images were captured at 2, 10 and 60 min. Projected circumferential areas of the specimens were drawn using the ImageJ software. Volumetric total shrinkage was calculated from the ratio of the areas obtained from pre- and post-curing. Results were analyzed using One-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) and Tukey test. Volumetric total shrinkage values were significantly different among the composite materials (p < .001). The volumetric shrinkage (%) mean and results of Tukey test at 60 min were Z100 3.45±0.30 (A); Gradia Direct Anterior 3.00 ± 0.23 (B); Spectra Smart 2.89 ± 0.35 (B); Filtek Z350 XT 2.65 ± 0.37 (BC); Aura Bulk Fill 2.42 ± 0.25 (CD); Vittra APS 2.14 ± 0.35 (DE); Opus Bulk Fill APS 1.91 ± 0.24 (E); Beautifil II LS 1.18 ± 0.16 (F). The optical method using a DSLR camera, was suitable for total shrinkage evaluation and will allow assessment of total shrinkage without the need for specialized equipment.


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Language: English Journal: Braz. oral res. (Online) Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil / United States Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal de Goiás/BR / University of Tennessee/US

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Language: English Journal: Braz. oral res. (Online) Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil / United States Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal de Goiás/BR / University of Tennessee/US