Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic performance of the RSNA-proposed classification for COVID-19 pneumonia versus pre-pandemic controls
Rocha, Cauã O.; Prioste, Tássia A.D.; Faccin, Carlo S.; Folador, Luciano; Tonetto, Mateus S.; Knijnik, Pedro G.; Mainardi, Natalia B.; Borges, Rogério B.; Garcia, Tiago S..
  • Rocha, Cauã O.; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA). Radiology Department. BR
  • Prioste, Tássia A.D.; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA). Radiology Department. BR
  • Faccin, Carlo S.; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA). Radiology Department. BR
  • Folador, Luciano; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA). Radiology Department. BR
  • Tonetto, Mateus S.; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA). Radiology Department. BR
  • Knijnik, Pedro G.; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. School of Medicine. BR
  • Mainardi, Natalia B.; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. School of Medicine. BR
  • Borges, Rogério B.; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Graduate Research Group (GPPG). Biostatistics Unit. BR
  • Garcia, Tiago S.; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA). Radiology Department. BR
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 26(1): 101665, 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1364545
ABSTRACT
Abstract Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) classification system for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia compared to pre-pandemic chest computed tomography (CT) scan images to mitigate the risk of bias regarding the reference standard. Materials and methods This was a retrospective, cross-sectional, diagnostic test accuracy study. Chest CT scans, carried out from May 1 to June 30, 2020, and from May 1 to July 17, 2017, were consecutively selected for the COVID-19 (positive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR] for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 result) and control (pre-pandemic) groups, respectively. Four expert thoracic radiologists blindly interpreted each CT scan image. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Results A total of 160 chest CT scan images were included 79 in the COVID-19 group (56 [43.5-67] years old, 41 men) and 81 in the control group (62 [52-72] years old, 44 men). Typically, an estimated specificity of 98.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 98.1%-98.4%) was obtained. For the indeterminate classification as a diagnostic threshold, an estimated sensitivity of 88.3% (95% CI 84.7%-91.7%) and a specificity of 79.0% (95% CI 74.5%-83.4%), with an area under the curve of 0.865 (95% CI 0.838-0.895), were obtained. Conclusion The RSNA classification system shows strong diagnostic accuracy for COVID-19 pneumonia, even against pre-pandemic controls. It can be an important aid in clinical decision-making, especially when a typical or indeterminate pattern is found, possibly advising retesting following an initial negative RT-PCR result and streamlining early management and isolation.


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Braz. j. infect. dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA)/BR / Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre/BR / Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Braz. j. infect. dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA)/BR / Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre/BR / Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul/BR