Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Telemedicine diagnosis of acute respiratory tract infection patients is not inferior to face-to-face consultation: a randomized trial
Accorsi, Tarso Augusto Duenhas; Moreira, Flavio Tocci; Pedrotti, Carlos Henrique Sartorato; Amicis, Karine De; Correia, Renata Farias Vidigal; Morbeck, Renata Albaladejo; Medeiros, Fernanda Ferreira; Souza Jr, José Leão de; Cordioli, Eduardo.
  • Accorsi, Tarso Augusto Duenhas; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. São Paulo. BR
  • Moreira, Flavio Tocci; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. São Paulo. BR
  • Pedrotti, Carlos Henrique Sartorato; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. São Paulo. BR
  • Amicis, Karine De; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. São Paulo. BR
  • Correia, Renata Farias Vidigal; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. São Paulo. BR
  • Morbeck, Renata Albaladejo; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. São Paulo. BR
  • Medeiros, Fernanda Ferreira; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. São Paulo. BR
  • Souza Jr, José Leão de; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. São Paulo. BR
  • Cordioli, Eduardo; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. São Paulo. BR
Einstein (Säo Paulo) ; 20: eAO6800, 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1375332
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective To analyze telemedicine diagnostic accuracy in patients with respiratory infections during COVID-19 pandemic compared to face-to-face evaluation in the emergency department. Methods Randomized, unicentric study between September 2020 and November 2020 in patients with any respiratory symptom (exclusion criteria age >65 years, chronic heart or lung diseases, immunosuppressed). Patients were randomized 11 for brief telemedicine followed by face-to-face consultation or direct face-to-face evaluation. The primary endpoint was the International Classification of Diseases code. The secondary analysis comprised length of stay, diagnostic test ordering, medical prescription, and proposed destination. Results Ninety-eight patients were enrolled. The mean age was 36.3±9.7 years old, 57.1% were women, and 81.6% had diagnostic test ordered. Mean grouped by International Classification of Diseases code for upper respiratory tract infection, pharyngotonsillitis, and sinusitis showed no difference between study groups or secondary endpoints. The Telemedicine Group was representative of the population usually evaluated in this center. In the Telemedicine Group (n=48), 18.7% patients would be referred for evaluation at the emergency department. The distribution of diagnoses by telemedicine was 67.4% for upper respiratory tract infection, 2.3% for pharyngotonsillitis, and 0% for sinusitis, being statistically similar to the subsequent face-to-face assessment, respectively 72.1%, 11.6% and 7% (Kappa 0.386 [95%CI 0.112-0.66]; p=0.536). Telemedicine ordered COVID-19 molecular (RT-PCR) tests in 76.5% versus 79.4% in face-to-face evaluation (Kappa 0.715 [95%CI 0.413-1]; p>0.999). Conclusion Diagnostic telemedicine consultation of low-risk patients with acute respiratory symptoms is not inferior to face-to-face evaluation at emergency department. Telemedicine is to be reinforced in the health care system as a strategy for the initial assessment of acute patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04806477


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Einstein (Säo Paulo) Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Einstein (Säo Paulo) Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein/BR