Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diseño y validación de un instrumento de medición de la carga académica de estudiantes de carreras de la salud / Design of a real and perceived academic workload measurement instrument for health care undergraduate students
Harden-Díaz, Natalia; Pino-León, Constanza; Orrego-Molina, Shenda; Flores-Alvarado, Sandra; Esturillo-Pinet, Javiera; Flores-Castro, Valentina; Rubio-Calero, Gabriela; Aguiar-Arias, Bárbara; Peralta-Camposano, José.
  • Harden-Díaz, Natalia; Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Medicina. Dirección Académica. Santiago. CL
  • Pino-León, Constanza; Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Medicina. Dirección Académica. Santiago. CL
  • Orrego-Molina, Shenda; Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Medicina. Dirección Académica. Santiago. CL
  • Flores-Alvarado, Sandra; Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Medicina. Dirección Académica. Santiago. CL
  • Esturillo-Pinet, Javiera; Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Medicina. Dirección Académica. Santiago. CL
  • Flores-Castro, Valentina; Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Medicina. Dirección Académica. Santiago. CL
  • Rubio-Calero, Gabriela; Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Medicina. Dirección de Pregrado. Santiago. CL
  • Aguiar-Arias, Bárbara; Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Medicina. Dirección de Pregrado. Santiago. CL
  • Peralta-Camposano, José; Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Medicina. Dirección Académica. Santiago. CL
Rev. méd. Chile ; 149(6): 873-880, jun. 2021. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1389540
ABSTRACT

Background:

A high academic workload may have adverse consequences among university students.

Aim:

To design and validate an instrument to measure both real and perceived academic workload for health care students. Material and

Methods:

The questionnaire was designed based on a bibliographic revision and the conduction of two focus groups conformed by undergraduate students from a Faculty of Medicine. Afterwards, it was submitted to qualitative pre-tests. The final instrument consists of a self-applied questionnaire with both a characterization section (10 questions) and one concerning academic workload by subject and semester (five and two questions, respectively). A national and international panel of 14 experts evaluated the survey content's validity. The analysis was performed according to the Content Validity Ratio and the Content Validity Index.

Results:

The complete instrument was validated with an 84% consensus between the judges. Each section of the instrument was approved separately with a 77% and a 94% agreement, respectively. After being individually analyzed by the judges, each question was validated. The wording of questions was improved taking the experts comments into consideration.

Conclusions:

The proposed instrument constitutes a contribution for the measurement of real and perceived academic workload for students.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Students / Workload Type of study: Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: Spanish Journal: Rev. méd. Chile Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Chile Institution/Affiliation country: Universidad de Chile/CL

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Students / Workload Type of study: Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: Spanish Journal: Rev. méd. Chile Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Chile Institution/Affiliation country: Universidad de Chile/CL