Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis / Enxertos para reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior: revisão sistemática e metanálise
ANDREZ, TÁSSIO NAVAJAS; CHAGAS, JÚLIA BEZERRA MARTINS; DOLIVEIRA, LÍVIA BAPTISTA.
  • ANDREZ, TÁSSIO NAVAJAS; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. São Paulo. BR
  • CHAGAS, JÚLIA BEZERRA MARTINS; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. São Paulo. BR
  • DOLIVEIRA, LÍVIA BAPTISTA; s.af
Acta ortop. bras ; 30(6): e256048, 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1419960
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Objective:

This study proposes to systematically review the literature and compare data on (1) function, (2) pain, (3) return to sport, and (4) complications after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft (QT) and hamstring tendon autograft (HT).

Methods:

In June 2021, a systematic review of the EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and LILACS databases was performed, based on PRISMA guidelines. The search strategy included the keywords "Previous Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction," "ACL reconstruction," "quadriceps tendon autograft," "quadriceps graft," "Hamstring-Tendon Autografts." Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager software (RevMan Web).

Results:

There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding function according to Lysholm score (MD 3.01; CI-0.30, 6.33, p = 0.08), the presence of pain (RR 0.89; CI-0.57, 1.39, p = 0.60), and re-rupture (RR 0.60; IC-0.19, 1.88, p = 0.38).

Conclusion:

QT and HT autografts show comparatively good results in ACL reconstruction without significant differences regarding function, pain, and rupture after surgical intervention. Level of Evidence II, Systematic Review of Level II Studies.
RESUMO
RESUMO

Objetivo:

Revisar sistematicamente a literatura e comparar dados sobre função, dor, retorno ao esporte e complicação após a reconstrução de ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA) com autoenxerto do tendão do quadríceps (TQ) e autoenxerto do tendão dos músculos isquiotibiais (TF).

Métodos:

Em junho de 2021, foi realizada revisão sistemática das bases de dados EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials e LILACS, baseada nas diretrizes do Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A estratégia de pesquisa incluiu as palavras-chave "Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction", "ACL reconstruction", "quadriceps tendon autograft", "quadriceps graft" e "Hamstring-Tendon Autografts". As metanálises foram realizadas usando o software Review Manager (RevMan Web).

Resultados:

Não houve diferenças significativas entre os dois grupos com relação à função pelo escore de Lysholm (MD 3,01; IC-0,30, 6,33, p = 0,08), presença de dor (RR 0,89; IC-0,57, 1,39, p = 0,60) e re-ruptura (RR 0,60; IC-0,19, 1,88, p = 0,38).

Conclusão:

Os autoenxertos de TQ e TF apresentam resultados comparativamente bons na reconstrução do LCA sem diferenças significativas com relação à função, dor e ruptura após a intervenção cirúrgica. Nível de Evidência II, Revisão Sistemática de Estudos de Nível II.


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Systematic reviews Language: English Journal: Acta ortop. bras Journal subject: Orthopedics Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Systematic reviews Language: English Journal: Acta ortop. bras Journal subject: Orthopedics Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein/BR