Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Airway management following head and neck microvascular reconstruction: is tracheostomy mandatory?
Madgar, Ory; Livneh, Nir; Dobriyan, Alex; Dagan, Elad; Alon, Eran E..
  • Madgar, Ory; Sheba Medical Center. Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. Tel Hashomer. IL
  • Livneh, Nir; Sheba Medical Center. Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. Tel Hashomer. IL
  • Dobriyan, Alex; Sheba Medical Center. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Tel Hashomer. IL
  • Dagan, Elad; Sheba Medical Center. Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. Tel Hashomer. IL
  • Alon, Eran E.; Sheba Medical Center. Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. Tel Hashomer. IL
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 88(supl.4): S44-S49, Nov.-Dec. 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1420868
ABSTRACT
Abstract

Objectives:

Airway management following maxillofacial microvascular reconstruction is a fundamental part of the perioperative management. In oral cavity microvascular reconstruction, the airway is potentially compromised by airway edema, flap edema or bulkiness, hematoma formation, or upper airway sequelae from surgery. Classical teaching advocates elective tracheostomy in patients undergoing maxillofacial free flap reconstruction, while others keep patients intubated overnight (delayed extubation). The optimal method for perioperative airway management is still debated. This study aim was to evaluate the morbidity associated with elective tracheostomy in patients undergoing maxillofacial microvascular reconstruction and to recognize those patients who can avoid elective tracheostomy.

Methods:

Retrospective review of patients who underwent maxillofacial microvascular free flap reconstruction, between November 1st 2010 and October 31st 2019 in our center.

Results:

One-hundred and nine patients underwent microvascular reconstruction in the maxillofacial region. Sixty-one patients underwent an elective tracheostomy upon the primary surgery. Forty-eight patients were left intubated overnight. Seven patients underwent a late tracheostomy which was performed upon a neck re-exploration for postoperative complications, except for one patient which was due to failed extubation attempt.

Conclusions:

Our results suggest, the routine use of elective tracheostomy in maxillofacial microvascular free flap reconstruction is unnecessary. Elective tracheostomy should be considered on case-to-case basis. Level of evidence 4. HIGHLIGHTS Airway management following maxillofacial microvascular reconstruction is complex. Lack of consensus exists regarding the optimal airway management perioperatively. Routine use of tracheostomy is unnecessary. Tracheostomy should be considered on a case-to-case basis.


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Language: English Journal: Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) Journal subject: Otolaryngology Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Israel Institution/Affiliation country: Sheba Medical Center/IL

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Language: English Journal: Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) Journal subject: Otolaryngology Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Israel Institution/Affiliation country: Sheba Medical Center/IL