Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Smartphone-enabled otoscopy: method evaluation in clinical practice
Kravchychyn, Fernanda Dal Bem; Meurer, Ana Taíse de Oliveira; Nogueira, Maria Helena Salgado Delamain Pupo; Balieiro, Fernando Oto; Balsalobre, Fernando de Andrade; Barauna Filho, Iulo Sérgio; Stamm, Aldo Eden Cassol.
  • Kravchychyn, Fernanda Dal Bem; Hospital Edmundo Vasconcelos. São Paulo. BR
  • Meurer, Ana Taíse de Oliveira; Hospital Edmundo Vasconcelos. São Paulo. BR
  • Nogueira, Maria Helena Salgado Delamain Pupo; Hospital Edmundo Vasconcelos. São Paulo. BR
  • Balieiro, Fernando Oto; Hospital Edmundo Vasconcelos. São Paulo. BR
  • Balsalobre, Fernando de Andrade; Hospital Edmundo Vasconcelos. São Paulo. BR
  • Barauna Filho, Iulo Sérgio; Hospital Edmundo Vasconcelos. São Paulo. BR
  • Stamm, Aldo Eden Cassol; Hospital Edmundo Vasconcelos. São Paulo. BR
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 89(1): 122-127, Jan.-Feb. 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1420919
ABSTRACT
Abstract Objective: To assess the diagnostic agreement between smartphone-enabled otoscopy and rigid otoendoscopy in tympanic membrane and middle ear diseases. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out to analyze otoscopies in patients seen at a general otorhinolaryngology (ORL) outpatient clinic, from June to December 2019. Eighty-three images of patients obtained from otoscopies performed through a smartphone device and a rigid endoscope were included, recorded, and stored for further analysis. The images were first analyzed by an experienced otologist, who assigned his diagnostic impression (defined as the gold standard) on each of the images. After this analysis, the images were displayed to a group of secondary raters (an experienced otorhinolaryngologist, a second-year resident in ORL, and a general practitioner). A questionnaire was applied related to each image. Results: There was high agreement between the smartphone device and the otoendoscopy images for all professionals, with a Kappa coefficient of 0.97 (p < 0.001). The smartphone device showed a diagnostic sensitivity of 81.1% and a specificity of 71.1%. As for the otoendoscopy, it showed a sensitivity of 84.7% and a specificity of 72.4%. The image classification as "2 = Good" was the most frequent one, with 34.9% for otoendoscopy and 31.6% for the smartphone device. Conclusion: There was a high diagnostic agreement between smartphone device-guided otoscopy and the rigid otoendoscopy, demonstrating the feasibility of using this device in clinical practice. Level of Evidence: 3


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Evaluation studies / Observational study / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) Journal subject: Otolaryngology Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital Edmundo Vasconcelos/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Evaluation studies / Observational study / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) Journal subject: Otolaryngology Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital Edmundo Vasconcelos/BR