Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Danish Validation of a Retronasal Olfactory Powder Test and Development of a Novel Quick Retronasal Olfactory Test
Niklassen, Andreas Steenholt; Sakthivel, Sukanya; Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck; Ovesen, Therese.
  • Niklassen, Andreas Steenholt; University Clinic for Flavour, Balance and Sleep. Regional Hospital Gødstrup. Ear, Nose and Throat Department. Herning. DK
  • Sakthivel, Sukanya; Aarhus University. Department of Clinical Medicine. Aarhus. DK
  • Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck; University Clinic for Flavour, Balance and Sleep. Regional Hospital Gødstrup. Ear, Nose and Throat Department. Herning. DK
  • Ovesen, Therese; University Clinic for Flavour, Balance and Sleep. Regional Hospital Gødstrup. Ear, Nose and Throat Department. Herning. DK
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 26(4): 615-623, Oct.-Dec. 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1421641
ABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction Quality of life is closely linked to retronasal olfactory function. Familiarity with odors vary, so tests need validation. Testing can be time-consuming, so a quick test and a thorough test are needed for clinical and research settings. Objectives The objectives of this study were to validate the original retronasal powder olfactory test in a Danish population and to develop a novel quick retronasal test for easy application. Methods Ninety-seven participants were included in the study, 59 healthy controls and 38 patients with olfactory impairment. The retronasal test was modified by substituting unfamiliar odors and descriptors and validated with a criterion of correct identification rate of 50% in the original test and 90% in the quick test. Items with over 90% correct identification rate in the modified original test were included in the quick test, resulting in a 10-item test. Results The modified retronasal olfactory test achieved good test characteristics, with a 10th percentile cut-off value of 13 sensitivity was 88.9%, specificity 83.0%, positive predictive value 78%, negative predictive value 91.7%, and the receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (ROC-AUC) was 0.86. The quick test achieved acceptable test characteristics, with a 10th percentile cut-off value of 8.2 sensitivity was 72.2%, specificity 90.6%, positive predictive value 83.9%, negative predictive value was 82.8%, and ROC-AUC 0.81. Conclusion Validation of both tests demonstrated satisfactory accuracy. We recommend the quick test for screening purposes, and the modified original version for a thorough evaluation. The tests are easily implemented as they are easy to understand and very affordable.


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) Journal subject: Otolaryngology Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Denmark Institution/Affiliation country: Aarhus University/DK / University Clinic for Flavour, Balance and Sleep/DK

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) Journal subject: Otolaryngology Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Denmark Institution/Affiliation country: Aarhus University/DK / University Clinic for Flavour, Balance and Sleep/DK