Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Body adiposity markers and insulin resistance in patients with type 1 diabetes
Marques, Camila Lemos; Beretta, Mileni Vanti; Prates, Raquel Eccel; de Almeida, Jussara Carnevale; Rodrigues, Ticiana da Costa.
  • Marques, Camila Lemos; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Programa de Pós-graduação em Endocrinologia. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Beretta, Mileni Vanti; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Programa de Pós-graduação em Endocrinologia. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Prates, Raquel Eccel; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Programa de Pós-graduação em Endocrinologia. Porto Alegre. BR
  • de Almeida, Jussara Carnevale; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Programa de Pós-graduação em Endocrinologia. Porto Alegre. BR
  • Rodrigues, Ticiana da Costa; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Programa de Pós-graduação em Endocrinologia. Porto Alegre. BR
Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) ; 67(3): 401-407, June 2023. tab
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1429749
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Body composition changes are associated with adverse effects such as increased insulin resistance (IR) in individuals with diabetes mellitus. This study aims to evaluate the association between different body adiposity markers and IR in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Subjects and

methods:

The cross-sectional study included outpatient adults with T1D from a university public hospital in southern Brazil. The body adiposity markers studied were waist circumference (WC), waist-height ratio (WHtR), body mass index (BMI), conicity index (CI), lipid accumulation product (LAP) and body adiposity index (BAI). IR was calculated using an Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate (EGDR) equation (analyzed in tertiles), considering an inverse relation between EGDR and IR. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% CIs of association of adiposity markers with IR.

Results:

A total of 128 patients were enrolled (51% women), with a median EGDR of 7.2 (4.4-8.7) mg.kg−1.min−1. EGDR was negatively correlated with WC (r = −0.36, p < 0.01), WHtR (r = −0.39, p < 0.01), CI (r = −0.44, p < 0.01), LAP (r = −0.41, p < 0.01) and BMI (r = −0.24, p < 0.01). After regression analyses, WC (OR = 2.07; CIs 1.12-3.337; p = 0.003), WHtR (OR = 2.77; CIs 1.59-4.79; p < 0.001), CI (OR = 2.59; CIs 1.43-4.66; p = 0.002), LAP (OR = 2.27; CIs 1.25-4.11; p = 0.007) and BMI (OR = 1.78; CIs 1.09-2.91; p = 0.019) remained associated with IR.

Conclusions:

The authors suggest using the studied adiposity markers as a routine since they were shown to be suitable parameters in association with IR.


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Observational study / Risk factors Language: English Journal: Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) Journal subject: Endocrinology / Metabolism Year: 2023 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Observational study / Risk factors Language: English Journal: Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) Journal subject: Endocrinology / Metabolism Year: 2023 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul/BR