Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalence and extent of Alveolar dehiscence and fenestration in Class I hyperdivergent subjects with different buccolingual inclinations of maxillary molar teeth: a CBCT study
Mohan, Reshma; Jain, Ravindra Kumar; Balasubramaniam, Arthi.
  • Mohan, Reshma; Saveetha University. Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences. Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Saveetha. IN
  • Jain, Ravindra Kumar; Saveetha University. Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences. Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Saveetha. IN
  • Balasubramaniam, Arthi; Saveetha University. Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences. Department of Public Health Dentistry. Saveetha. IN
Braz. j. oral sci ; 22: e239938, Jan.-Dec. 2023. ilus
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1523145
ABSTRACT
Buccolingual position of teeth could affect the prevalence of alveolar bone defects. Presence of alveolar defects may have a deleterious effect on orthodontic treatment. The aim was to assess the prevalence and extent of dehiscence and fenestration in Class I hyperdivergent subjects and correlate it with buccolingual inclinations(BL) of maxillary first molar teeth.

Methods:

This retrospective study involved 80 CBCTs of class I hyperdivergent subjects divided into two groups - group A (n=33) buccolingual inclination >9º and group B (n=47) buccolingual inclination <9º. Prevalence and extent of alveolar bone dehiscence and fenestrations were measured in CBCTs using OSIRIX Lite software. Descriptive statistics, Mann Whitney U test and Spearman correlation were done for evaluating intergroup differences and correlation with Buccolingual inclination.

Results:

Overall prevalence of dehiscence and fenestration in maxillary first molars was 60.95% and 5% respectively. In the buccal alveolar bone, prevalence of dehiscence was highest in group A (84.6%) for 16 and in the lingual alveolar bone prevalence of dehiscence was highest in group B (71.4%) for 26 . On intergroup comparison, the extent of lingual alveolar bone dehiscence (26) in group B was significantly higher (p value <0.05) than in group A. No significant correlation between the extent of dehiscence and fenestration with buccolingual inclination of molar teeth was noted.

Conclusion:

Molar teeth with BL inclinations of more than 9º had higher prevalence of dehiscence on the buccal side and molar teeth with BL inclinations less than 9 degrees had more dehiscence on the lingual side. But no significant correlation of BL inclination with prevalence and extent of dehiscence and fenestration was noted

Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Maxillary Diseases / Alveolar Bone Loss / Malocclusion, Angle Class I / Molar Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: India Institution/Affiliation country: Saveetha University/IN

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Maxillary Diseases / Alveolar Bone Loss / Malocclusion, Angle Class I / Molar Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: India Institution/Affiliation country: Saveetha University/IN