Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Developmental dysplasia of the hip: do the responsible for screening know what to do?
Souza, Bruno Gonçalves Schröder e; Melo, Tiago Evangelista de; Resende, Thiago Mattos; Silva, Rafaela Clara Resende da; Cruz, Soraya Amanda; Oliveira, Valdeci Manoel de.
  • Souza, Bruno Gonçalves Schröder e; Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde de Juiz de Fora. Juiz de Fora. BR
  • Melo, Tiago Evangelista de; Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde de Juiz de Fora. Juiz de Fora. BR
  • Resende, Thiago Mattos; Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde de Juiz de Fora. Juiz de Fora. BR
  • Silva, Rafaela Clara Resende da; Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde de Juiz de Fora. Juiz de Fora. BR
  • Cruz, Soraya Amanda; Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde de Juiz de Fora. Juiz de Fora. BR
  • Oliveira, Valdeci Manoel de; Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde de Juiz de Fora. Juiz de Fora. BR
Acta ortop. bras ; 24(6): 312-317, Nov.-Dec. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-827700
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To evaluate the knowledge on developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) by professionals involved in its diagnosis.

Methods:

This is a cross-sectional study using questionnaires to assess the knowledge about DDH. Orthopedic surgeons and pediatricians, residents and medical students from a tertiary teaching hospital were included in the study.

Results:

We evaluated 142 medical students, eight orthopedic residents, ten pediatric residents, seven pediatricians, and nine orthopedic surgeons; 50% declared not having examined any DDH case in the last year and only three had diagnosed more than 10 cases during their career. Regarding self-assessed knowledge (0-10), the average score was 4.25 [n=186; SD=2.43]. Nineteen percent of the participants ignored semiological tests and 26.1% of pediatricians (specialists and residents), were unaware of how to perform them. The most acknowledged and neglected risk factor was pelvic presentation (68%) and CMT (9.3%), respectively. None of the participants were able to identify all the risk factors. The average number of risk factors identified was two (n=186; SD=1.58). Forty seven point three percent of the participants failed to recognize the time of birth as the ideal moment for diagnosis; 17% reported it was after the first month. Regarding neglected severe DDH, 45.3% failed to recognize its natural history.

Conclusion:

Knowledge on DDH among health professionals who are involved in screening is flawed. Level of Evidence IV, Developing a Decision Model.


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors / Screening study Language: English Journal: Acta ortop. bras Journal subject: Orthopedics Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde de Juiz de Fora/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors / Screening study Language: English Journal: Acta ortop. bras Journal subject: Orthopedics Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde de Juiz de Fora/BR