Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Responsiveness of the domain climbing up and going down stairs of the Functional Evaluation scale for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: a one-year follow-up
Albuquerque, Priscila S; Voos, Mariana C; Simões, Mariene S; Martini, Joyce; Monteiro, Carlos B. M; Caromano, Fatima A.
  • Albuquerque, Priscila S; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. São Paulo. BR
  • Voos, Mariana C; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. São Paulo. BR
  • Simões, Mariene S; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. São Paulo. BR
  • Martini, Joyce; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. São Paulo. BR
  • Monteiro, Carlos B. M; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. São Paulo. BR
  • Caromano, Fatima A; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. São Paulo. BR
Braz. j. phys. ther. (Impr.) ; 20(5): 471-476, Sept.-Oct. 2016. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-828292
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To determine the responsiveness of the domain climbing up and going down stairs of the Functional Evaluation Scale for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (FES-DMD-D3) in a one-year follow-up study.

Method:

The study included 26 patients with DMD. Effect Size (ES) and Standardized Response Mean (SRM) described the scale’s responsiveness.

Results:

For climbing up stairs, ES showed that responsiveness was low in the three-month assessments (0.26; 0.35; 0.13; 0.17), low to moderate in the six-month assessments (0.58; 0.48; 0.33), moderate in the nine-month assessments (0.70; 0.68), and high in the 12-month assessment (0.88). SRM showed that responsiveness was low in the three-month assessments (0.29; 0.38; 0.18; and 0.19), low to moderate in the six-month assessments (0.59; 0.51; 0.36), moderate in the nine-month assessments (0.74 and 0.70), and high in the 12-month assessment (0.89). For going down stairs, ES showed that responsiveness was low in the three- and six-month assessments (0.16; 0.25; 0.09; 0.08 and 0.48; 0.35; 0.18, respectively), low to moderate in the nine-month assessments (0.59; 0.44), and moderate in the 12-month assessment (0.71). SRM showed that responsiveness was low in the three- and six-month assessments (0.25; 0.35; 0.12; 0.09 and 0.47; 0.38; 0.21, respectively), low to moderate in the nine-month assessment (0.62; 0.49), and moderate in the 12-month assessment (0.74).

Conclusion:

Climbing up stairs should be assessed at intervals of nine months or longer, when responsiveness is moderate to high. Going down stairs should be assessed annually because moderate responsiveness was observed in this period.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne / Motor Activity Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Braz. j. phys. ther. (Impr.) Journal subject: MEDICINA FISICA E REABILITACAO Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne / Motor Activity Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Braz. j. phys. ther. (Impr.) Journal subject: MEDICINA FISICA E REABILITACAO Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de São Paulo/BR