Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is handgrip strength normalized to body weight a useful tool to identify dynapenia and functional incapacity in post-menopausal women?
Dulac, Maude; Boutros, Guy El Hajj; Pion, Charlotte; Barbat-Artigas, Sébastien; Gouspillou, Gilles; Aubertin-Leheudre, Mylène.
  • Dulac, Maude; University of Quebec at Montreal. Department of Exercise Science. Montreal. CA
  • Boutros, Guy El Hajj; University of Quebec at Montreal. Department of Exercise Science. Montreal. CA
  • Pion, Charlotte; University of Quebec at Montreal. Department of Exercise Science. Montreal. CA
  • Barbat-Artigas, Sébastien; University of Quebec at Montreal. Department of Exercise Science. Montreal. CA
  • Gouspillou, Gilles; University of Quebec at Montreal. Department of Exercise Science. Montreal. CA
  • Aubertin-Leheudre, Mylène; University of Quebec at Montreal. Department of Exercise Science. Montreal. CA
Braz. j. phys. ther. (Impr.) ; 20(6): 510-516, Nov.-Dec. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-828300
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective To investigate whether handgrip strength normalized to body weight could be a useful clinical tool to identify dynapenia and assess functional capacity in post-menopausal women. Method A total of 136 postmenopausal women were recruited. Body composition (Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry [DEXA], Bio-electrical Impedence Analysis [BIA]), grip strength (dynamometer) and functional capacity (senior fitness tests) were evaluated. Dynapenia was established according to a handgrip strength index (handgrip strength divided by body weight (BW) in Kg/KgBW) obtained from a reference population of young women Type I dynapenic (<0.44 kg/KgBW) and type II dynapenic (<0.35 kg/KgBW). Results The results show a positive correlation between handgrip strength index (in kg/KgBW) and alternate-step test (r=0.30, p<0.001), chair-stand test (r=0.25, p<0.005) and one-leg stance test (r=0.335, p<0.001). The results also showed a significant difference in non-dynapenic compared to type I dynapenic and type II dynapenic for the chair-stand test (Non-dynapenic 12.0±3.0; Type I 11.7±2.5; Type II 10.3±3.0) (p=0.037 and p=0.005, respectively) and the one-leg stance test (Non-dynapenic 54.2±14.2; Type I 43.8±21.4; Type II 35.0±21.8) (p=0.030 and p=0.004, respectively). Finally, a significant difference was observed between type II dynapenic and non-dynapenic for the chair-stand test (p=0.032), but not with type I dynapenic. Conclusion The results showed that handgrip strength was positively correlated with functional capacity. In addition, non-dynapenic women displayed a better functional status when compared to type I and type II dynapenic women. Thus, the determination of the handgrip strength thresholds could be an accessible and affordable clinical tool to identify people at risk of autonomy loss.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Body Composition / Absorptiometry, Photon / Postmenopause / Hand Strength Limits: Female / Humans Language: English Journal: Braz. j. phys. ther. (Impr.) Journal subject: MEDICINA FISICA E REABILITACAO Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Canada Institution/Affiliation country: University of Quebec at Montreal/CA

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Body Composition / Absorptiometry, Photon / Postmenopause / Hand Strength Limits: Female / Humans Language: English Journal: Braz. j. phys. ther. (Impr.) Journal subject: MEDICINA FISICA E REABILITACAO Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Canada Institution/Affiliation country: University of Quebec at Montreal/CA