Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of ultrasonic activation in association with different final irrigants on intracanal smear layer removal
Souza, Matheus Albino; Motter, Felipe Trentin; Fontana, Tobias Pitton; Ribeiro, Marlos Barbosa; Miyagaki, Daniela Cristina; Cecchin, Doglas.
  • Souza, Matheus Albino; Universidade de Passo Fundo. School of Dentistry. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Passo Fundo. BR
  • Motter, Felipe Trentin; Universidade de Passo Fundo. School of Dentistry. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Passo Fundo. BR
  • Fontana, Tobias Pitton; Universidade de Passo Fundo. School of Dentistry. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Passo Fundo. BR
  • Ribeiro, Marlos Barbosa; Universidade de Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Piracicaba. BR
  • Miyagaki, Daniela Cristina; Universidade de Passo Fundo. School of Dentistry. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Passo Fundo. BR
  • Cecchin, Doglas; Universidade de Passo Fundo. School of Dentistry. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Passo Fundo. BR
Braz. j. oral sci ; 15(1): 16-20, Jan.-Mar. 2016. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-830996
ABSTRACT

Aim:

To evaluate the influence of ultrasonic activation (US) with different irrigant regimens in smearlayer removal.

Methods:

One hundred bovine incisors were instrumented and divided into tengroups (n=10) according to final irrigation protocols distilled water (DW); DW+US; 17% EDTA;QMix; 10% citric acid; 37% phosphoric acid; 17% EDTA+US; QMix+US; 10% citric acid+US; 37%phosphoric acid+US. The samples were then submitted to scanning electron microscopy where ascore system was used to evaluate the images and effectiveness of proposed treatments. The datawere statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests for intergroup comparisonsas well as the Wilcoxon and Friedman tests for intragroup comparisons at 5% significance level.

Results:

In the cervical third, groups 17% EDTA, QMix, 10% citric acid, 17% EDTA+US, QMix+USand 10% citric acid+US were more effective in smear layer removal (p<0.05); in the middle third,groups 17% EDTA+US and QMix+US were more effective in smear layer removal (p<0.05); in theapical third, groups 17% EDTA,17% EDTA+US and QMix+US were more effective in smear layerremoval (p<0.05).

Conclusions:

US can aid 17% EDTA and QMix in smear layer removal at themiddle third and QMix at the apical third, contributing to the cleaning of root canal system.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Root Canal Irrigants / Ultrasonics / Microscopy, Electron, Scanning / Smear Layer Type of study: Practice guideline / Risk factors Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de Campinas/BR / Universidade de Passo Fundo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Root Canal Irrigants / Ultrasonics / Microscopy, Electron, Scanning / Smear Layer Type of study: Practice guideline / Risk factors Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de Campinas/BR / Universidade de Passo Fundo/BR