Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Oral motor and electromyographic characterization of adults with facial fractures: a comparison between different fracture severities
da Silva, Amanda Pagliotto; Sassi, Fernanda Chiarion; Bastos, Endrigo; Alonso, Nivaldo; de Andrade, Claudia Regina Furquim.
  • da Silva, Amanda Pagliotto; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Divisao de Miologia Orofacial, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP. Sao Paulo. BR
  • Sassi, Fernanda Chiarion; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Divisao de Miologia Orofacial, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP. Sao Paulo. BR
  • Bastos, Endrigo; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Divisao de Miologia Orofacial, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP. Sao Paulo. BR
  • Alonso, Nivaldo; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Divisao de Miologia Orofacial, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP. Sao Paulo. BR
  • de Andrade, Claudia Regina Furquim; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Divisao de Miologia Orofacial, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP. Sao Paulo. BR
Clinics ; 72(5): 276-283, May 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-840080
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To characterize the oral motor system of adults with facial injuries and to compare the oral motor performance/function between two different groups.

METHODS:

An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in 38 patients presenting with facial trauma who were assigned to the Division of Orofacial Myology of a Brazilian School Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups Group 1 (G1) consisted of 19 patients who were submitted to open reduction of at least one facial fracture, and Group 2 (G2) consisted of 19 individuals who were submitted to closed fracture reduction with maxillomandibular fixation. For comparison purposes, a group of 19 healthy volunteers was recruited. All participants underwent a clinical assessment that included an oral motor evaluation, assessment of the mandibular range of motions, and electromyographic assessment of the masticatory muscles.

RESULTS:

Clinical assessment of the oral motor organs indicated that G1 and G2 presented deficits related to the posture, position, and mobility of the oral motor organs. Patients also presented limited mandibular ranges of movement. Deficits were greater for individuals in G1, especially for maximal incisor opening. Additionally, patients in G1 and G2 presented a similar electromyographic profile of the masticatory muscles (i.e., patients with facial fractures presented lower overall muscle activity and significant asymmetrical activity of the masseter muscle during maximum voluntary teeth clenching).

CONCLUSION:

Patients in G1 and G2 presented similar functional deficits after fracture treatment. The severity of facial fractures did not influence muscle function/performance 4 months after the correction of fractures.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Fractures, Bone / Maxillofacial Injuries / Motor Activity / Mouth Type of study: Observational study / Prevalence study / Risk factors Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Clinics Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Fractures, Bone / Maxillofacial Injuries / Motor Activity / Mouth Type of study: Observational study / Prevalence study / Risk factors Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Clinics Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de São Paulo/BR