Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The burden of chronic ureteral stenting in cervical cancer survivors
Goldfarb, Robert A; Fan, Yunhua; Jarosek, Stephanie; Elliott, Sean P.
  • Goldfarb, Robert A; University of Minnesota. Department of Urology. Minneapolis. US
  • Fan, Yunhua; University of Minnesota. Department of Urology. Minneapolis. US
  • Jarosek, Stephanie; University of Minnesota. Department of Urology. Minneapolis. US
  • Elliott, Sean P; University of Minnesota. Department of Urology. Minneapolis. US
Int. braz. j. urol ; 43(1): 104-111, Jan.-Feb. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-840803
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Purpose Ureteral obstruction in cervical cancer occurs in up to 11% of patients, many of whom undergo ureteral stenting. Our aim was to describe the patient burden of chronic ureteral stenting in a population-based cohort by detailing two

objectives:

(1) the frequency of repeat procedures for ureteral obstruction; and, (2) the frequency of urinary adverse effects (UAEs) (e.g., lower urinary tract symptoms, flank pain). Materials and Methods From SEER-Medicare, we identified 202 women who underwent ureteral stent placement prior to or following cervical cancer treatment. The frequency of repeat procedures and rate ratios were compared between treatment modalities. The rates and rate ratios of UAEs were compared between our primary cohort (stent + cervical cancer) and the following groups no stent + cervical cancer, stent + no cancer, and no stent + no cancer. The “no cancer” group was drawn from the 5% Medicare sample. Results 117/202 women (58%) underwent >1 stent procedure. The frequency of additional procedures was significantly higher in patients who received radiation as part of their treatment. UAEs were very common in women with stent + cancer. The rate of UTI was 190 (per 100 person-years), 67 for LUTS, 42 for stones, and 6 for flank pain. These rates were 3-10 fold higher than in the no stent + no cancer control group; rates were also higher than in the no stent + cancer and the stent + no cancer women. Conclusions The burden of disease associated with ureteral stents is higher than expected and urologists should be actively involved in stent management, screening for associated symptoms and offering definitive reconstruction when appropriate.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Ureteral Obstruction / Stents / Uterine Cervical Neoplasms Type of study: Etiology study / Incidence study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States Institution/Affiliation country: University of Minnesota/US

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Ureteral Obstruction / Stents / Uterine Cervical Neoplasms Type of study: Etiology study / Incidence study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States Institution/Affiliation country: University of Minnesota/US