Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of self-reported diabetes in a representative sample of São Paulo city
Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello; Teixeira, Juliana Araújo; Sales, Cristiane Hermes; Castro, Michelle Alessandra de; Cesar, Chester Luiz Galvão; Alves, Maria Cecilia Goi Porto; Goldbaum, Moisés; Marchioni, Dirce Maria; Fisberg, Regina Mara.
  • Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello; Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo. BR
  • Teixeira, Juliana Araújo; Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo. BR
  • Sales, Cristiane Hermes; Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo. BR
  • Castro, Michelle Alessandra de; Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo. BR
  • Cesar, Chester Luiz Galvão; Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo. BR
  • Alves, Maria Cecilia Goi Porto; Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo. BR
  • Goldbaum, Moisés; Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo. BR
  • Marchioni, Dirce Maria; Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo. BR
  • Fisberg, Regina Mara; Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo. BR
Rev. saúde pública ; 51: 20, 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-845888
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To validate the self-reported diabetes mellitus in adults and older adults living in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS We have used data of 569 subjects (284 adults and 285 older adults), participants of the population-based cross-sectional study Inquérito de Saúde do Município de São Paulo (Health Survey of São Paulo). Fasting glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dL) and/or use of drugs (oral hypoglycemic and/or insulin) defined the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. We have validated the self-reported diabetes mellitus by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values. We have used Poisson regression with robust variance to verify the factors associated with the sensitivity of the self-reported datum. For all analyses, we have considered the sample design of the study. RESULTS The sensitivity of self-reported diabetes mellitus was 63.8% (95%CI 49.2–76.3), specificity was 99.7% (95%CI 99.1–99.9), positive predictive value was 95.5% (95%CI 84.4–98.8), and negative predictive value was 96.9% (95%CI 94.9–98.2). The correct reporting of diabetes mellitus was more prevalent among older adults (PR = 2.0; 95%CI 1.2–3.5) than among adults. CONCLUSIONS The use of the datum of self-reported diabetes mellitus is valid, especially among older adults living in the city of São Paulo. The results highlight the need to track diabetes mellitus in asymptomatic subjects who have one or more risk factors for it, mainly in the adult population of this city.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Diabetes Mellitus / Diagnostic Self Evaluation / Self Report Type of study: Diagnostic study / Etiology study / Observational study / Prevalence study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Rev. saúde pública Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2017 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Diabetes Mellitus / Diagnostic Self Evaluation / Self Report Type of study: Diagnostic study / Etiology study / Observational study / Prevalence study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Rev. saúde pública Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2017 Type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de São Paulo/BR