Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Smokefree implementation in Colombia: Monitoring, outside funding, and business support / Implementación de los espacios libres de humo en Colombia: vigilancia, financiación externa y apoyo empresarial
Uang, Randy; Crosbie, Eric; Glantz, Stanton A.
  • Uang, Randy; University of California. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education. San Francisco. US
  • Crosbie, Eric; University of California. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education. San Francisco. US
  • Glantz, Stanton A; University of California. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education. San Francisco. US
Salud pública Méx ; 59(2): 128-136, mar.-abr. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-846072
ABSTRACT
Abstract

Objective:

To analyze successful national smokefree policy implementation in Colombia, a middle income country. Materials and

methods:

Key informants at the national and local levels were interviewed and news sources and government ministry resolutions were reviewed.

Results:

Colombia’s Ministry of Health coordinated local implementation practices, which were strongest in larger cities with supportive leadership. Nongovernmental organizations provided technical assistance and highlighted noncompliance. Organizations outside Colombia funded some of these efforts. The bar owners’ association provided concerted education campaigns. Tobacco interests did not openly challenge implementation.

Conclusions:

Health organization monitoring, external funding, and hospitality industry support contributed to effective implementation, and could be cultivated in other low and middle income countries.
RESUMEN
Resumen

Objetivo:

Analizar la implementación exitosa de políticas nacionales de ambientes libres de humo en Colombia, un país de ingresos medios. Material y

métodos:

Entrevistas con informantes claves a nivel nacional y local, y revisión de artículos en las noticias y resoluciones ministeriales nacionales.

Resultados:

El Ministerio de Salud de Colombia coordinó las prácticas locales para la implementación, que fueron más fuertes en las ciudades grandes y en las ciudades con líderes políticos que la apoyaron. Organizaciones no gubernamentales proporcionaron asistencia técnica y destacaron el incumplimiento. Organizaciones fuera de Colombia financiaron algunos de estos esfuerzos. La asociación de propietarios de bares proporcionó campañas de educación concertadas. Intereses tabacaleros no desafiaron abiertamente la implementación. Conclusiones. La vigilancia de las organizaciones no gubernamentales, la financiación externa y el apoyo de la industria de la hospitalidad contribuyeron a una implementación eficaz. Tales factores pueden ser cultivados en países de ingresos bajos y medios.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Smoke-Free Policy Type of study: Health economic evaluation / Prognostic study / Screening study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: South America / Colombia Language: English Journal: Salud pública Méx Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States Institution/Affiliation country: University of California/US

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Smoke-Free Policy Type of study: Health economic evaluation / Prognostic study / Screening study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: South America / Colombia Language: English Journal: Salud pública Méx Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States Institution/Affiliation country: University of California/US