Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laryngeal tube suction for airway management during in-hospital emergencies
Mutlak, Haitham; Weber, Christian Friedrich; Meininger, Dirk; Cuca, Colleen; Zacharowski, Kai; Byhahn, Christian; Schalk, Richard.
Affiliation
  • Mutlak, Haitham; Goethe-University Hospital. Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy. Department of Anesthesiology. Frankfurt. DE
  • Weber, Christian Friedrich; Goethe-University Hospital. Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy. Department of Anesthesiology. Frankfurt. DE
  • Meininger, Dirk; Goethe-University Hospital. Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy. Department of Anesthesiology. Frankfurt. DE
  • Cuca, Colleen; Goethe-University Hospital. Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy. Department of Anesthesiology. Frankfurt. DE
  • Zacharowski, Kai; Goethe-University Hospital. Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy. Department of Anesthesiology. Frankfurt. DE
  • Byhahn, Christian; Goethe-University Hospital. Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy. Department of Anesthesiology. Frankfurt. DE
  • Schalk, Richard; Goethe-University Hospital. Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy. Department of Anesthesiology. Frankfurt. DE
Clinics ; Clinics;72(7): 422-425, July 2017. graf
Article in En | LILACS | ID: biblio-890714
Responsible library: BR1.1
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The role of supraglottic airway devices in emergency airway management is highlighted in international airway management guidelines. We evaluated the application of the new generation laryngeal tube suction (LTS-II/LTS-D) in the management of in-hospital unexpected difficult airway and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

METHODS:

During a seven-year period, patients treated with a laryngeal tube who received routine anesthesia and had an unexpected difficult airway (Cormack Lehane Grade 3-4), who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation outside the operating room and had a difficult airway were evaluated. Successful placement of the LTS II/LTS-D, sufficient ventilation, time to placement, number of placement attempts, stomach content, peripheral oxygen saturation/end-tidal carbon dioxide development (SpO2/etCO2) over 5 minutes, subjective overall assessment and complications were recorded.

RESULTS:

In total, 106 adult patients were treated using an LTS-II/LTS-D. The main indication for placement was a difficult airway (75%, n=80), followed by cardiopulmonary resuscitation (25%, n=26) or an overlap between both (18%, n=19). In 94% of patients (n=100), users placed the laryngeal tube during the first attempt. In 93% of patients (n=98), the tube was placed within 30 seconds. A significant increase in SpO2 from 97% (0-100) to 99% (5-100) was observed in the whole population and in cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients. The average initial etCO2 of 39.5 mmHg (0-100 mmHg) decreased significantly to an average of 38.4 mmHg (10-62 mmHg) after 5 minutes. A comparison of cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients with non-cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients regarding gastric contents showed no significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS:

LTS-D/LTS-II use for in-hospital unexpected difficult airway management provides a secure method for primary airway management until other options such as video laryngoscopy or fiber optic intubation become available.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Main subject: Respiration, Artificial / Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Intubation, Intratracheal Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Clinics Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2017 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Main subject: Respiration, Artificial / Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Intubation, Intratracheal Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Clinics Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2017 Type: Article