Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bacterial endotoxin adhesion to different types of orthodontic adhesives
ROMUALDO, Priscilla Coutinho; GUERRA, Thaís Rodrigues; ROMANO, Fábio Lourenço; SILVA, Raquel Assed Bezerra da; BRANDÃO, Izaíra Tincani; SILVA, Célio Lopes; SILVA, Lea Assed Bezerra da; NELSON-FILHO, Paulo.
  • ROMUALDO, Priscilla Coutinho; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto. Departamento de Clínica Infantil. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • GUERRA, Thaís Rodrigues; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto. Departamento de Clínica Infantil. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • ROMANO, Fábio Lourenço; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto. Departamento de Clínica Infantil. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • SILVA, Raquel Assed Bezerra da; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto. Departamento de Clínica Infantil. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • BRANDÃO, Izaíra Tincani; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto. Departamento de Clínica Infantil. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • SILVA, Célio Lopes; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto. Departamento de Clínica Infantil. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • SILVA, Lea Assed Bezerra da; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto. Departamento de Clínica Infantil. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • NELSON-FILHO, Paulo; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto. Departamento de Clínica Infantil. Ribeirão Preto. BR
J. appl. oral sci ; 25(4): 436-441, July-Aug. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-893638
ABSTRACT
Abstract Bacterial endotoxin (LPS) adhesion to orthodontic brackets is a known contributing factor to inflammation of the adjacent gingival tissues. Objective The aim of this study was to assess whether LPS adheres to orthodontic adhesive systems, comparing two commercial brands. Material and Methods Forty specimens were fabricated from Transbond XT and Light Bond composite and bonding agent components (n=10/component), then contaminated by immersion in a bacterial endotoxin solution. Contaminated and non-contaminated acrylic resin samples were used as positive and negative control groups, respectively. LPS quantification was performed by the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate QCL-1000™ test. Data obtained were scored and subjected to the Chi-square test using a significance level of 5%. Results There was endotoxin adhesion to all materials (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between composites/bonding agents and acrylic resin (p>0.05). There was no significant difference (p>0.05) among commercial brands. Affinity of endotoxin was significantly greater for the bonding agents (p=0.0025). Conclusions LPS adhered to both orthodontic adhesive systems. Regardless of the brand, the endotoxin had higher affinity for the bonding agents than for the composites. There is no previous study assessing the affinity of LPS for orthodontic adhesive systems. This study revealed that LPS adheres to orthodontic adhesive systems. Therefore, additional care is recommended to orthodontic applications of these materials.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Bacterial Adhesion / Lipopolysaccharides / Composite Resins / Resin Cements / Escherichia coli Language: English Journal: J. appl. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Bacterial Adhesion / Lipopolysaccharides / Composite Resins / Resin Cements / Escherichia coli Language: English Journal: J. appl. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de São Paulo/BR