Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-utility of quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine in Brazil - comparison of outcomes from different static model types
Van Bellinghen, Laure-Anne; Marijam, Alen; de Araujo, Gabriela Tannus Branco; Gomez, Jorge; Van Vlaenderen, Ilse.
  • Van Bellinghen, Laure-Anne; CHESS in Health. Bonheiden. BE
  • Marijam, Alen; GSK. Wavre. BE
  • de Araujo, Gabriela Tannus Branco; AxiaBio. São Paulo. BR
  • Gomez, Jorge; GSK. Victoria, Buenos Aires. AR
  • Van Vlaenderen, Ilse; CHESS in Health. Bonheiden. BE
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 22(1): 1-10, Jan.-feb. 2018. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-951627
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Background:

Influenza burden in Brazil is considerable with 4.2-6.4 million cases in 2008 and influenza-like-illness responsible for 16.9% of hospitalizations. Cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination may be assessed by different types of models, with limitations due to data availability, assumptions, and modelling approach.

Objective:

To understand the impact of model complexity, the cost-utility of quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccines in Brazil was estimated using three distinct models a 1-year decision tree population model with three age groups (FLOU); a more detailed 1-year population model with five age groups (FLORA); and a more complex lifetime multi-cohort Markov model with nine age groups (FLORENCE).

Methods:

Analysis 1 (impact of model structure) compared each model using the same data inputs (i.e., best available data for FLOU). Analysis 2 (impact of increasing granularity) compared each model populated with the best available data for that model.

Results:

Using the best data for each model, the discounted cost-utility ratio of quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine was R$20,428 with FLOU, R$22,768 with FLORA (versus R$20,428 in Analysis 1), and, R$19,257 with FLORENCE (versus R$22,490 in Analysis 1) using a lifetime horizon. Conceptual differences between FLORA and FLORENCE meant the same assumption regarding increased all-cause mortality in at-risk individuals had an opposite effect on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in Analysis 2 versus 1, and a proportionally higher number of vaccinated elderly in FLORENCE reduced this ratio in Analysis 2.

Discussion:

FLOU provided adequate cost-effectiveness estimates with data in broad age groups. FLORA increased insights (e.g., in healthy versus at-risk, paediatric, respiratory/non-respiratory complications). FLORENCE provided greater insights and precision (e.g., in elderly, costs and complications, lifetime cost-effectiveness).

Conclusion:

All three models predicted a cost per quality-adjusted life year gained for quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine in the range of R$19,257 (FLORENCE) to R$22,768 (FLORA) with the best available data in Brazil (Appendix A).
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Influenza Vaccines / Vaccination / Models, Economic / Influenza, Human Type of study: Etiology study / Health economic evaluation / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Braz. j. infect. dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Argentina / Belgium / Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: AxiaBio/BR / CHESS in Health/BE / GSK/AR / GSK/BE

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Influenza Vaccines / Vaccination / Models, Economic / Influenza, Human Type of study: Etiology study / Health economic evaluation / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Braz. j. infect. dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Argentina / Belgium / Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: AxiaBio/BR / CHESS in Health/BE / GSK/AR / GSK/BE