Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Volumetric reconstruction and determination of minimum crosssectional area of the pharynx in patients with cleft lip and palate: comparison between two different softwares
Pinheiro, Maycon Lázaro; Yatabe, Marília; Ioshida, Marcos; Orlandi, Luan; Dumast, Priscille de; Departamento de Ciências BiológicasTrindade-Suedam, Ivy Kiemle.
  • Pinheiro, Maycon Lázaro; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru. Bauru. BR
  • Yatabe, Marília; Universidade de São Paulo. Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais. Bauru. BR
  • Ioshida, Marcos; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru. Bauru. BR
  • Orlandi, Luan; Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e de Computação. São Carlos. BR
  • Dumast, Priscille de; University of Michigan. School of Dentistry. Ann Arbor. US
  • Departamento de Ciências BiológicasTrindade-Suedam, Ivy Kiemle; Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru. Departamento de Ciências BiológicasTrindade-Suedam, Ivy Kiemle. Bauru. BR
J. appl. oral sci ; 26: e20170282, 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-954494
ABSTRACT
Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of volumetric reconstruction of the pharynx by comparing the volume and minimum crosssectional area (mCSA) determined with open-source applications (ITK-Snap, www.itksnap.org ; SlicerCMF) and commercial software (Dolphin3D, 11.8, Dolphin Imaging & Management Solutions, Chatsworth, CA, USA) previously validated in the literature. Material and

Methods:

The sample comprised of 35 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate, with mean age of 29±15. Three-dimensional volumetric models of the pharynx were reconstructed using semi-automatic segmentation using the applications ITK-Snap (G1) and Dolphin3D (G2). Volumes and minimum cross-sectional areas were determined. Inter- and intra-observer error were calculated using ICC test. Comparison between applications was calculated using the Wilcoxon test.

Results:

Volumes and minimum crosssectional area were statistically similar between applications. ITK-Snap showed higher pharynx volumes, but lower mCSA. Visual assessment showed that 62.86% matched the region of mCSA in Dolphin3D and SPHARM-PDM.

Conclusion:

Measurements of volume and mCSA are statistically similar between applications. Therefore, open-source applications may be a viable option to assess upper airway dimensions using CBCT exams.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Pharynx / Software / Cleft Lip / Cleft Palate / Imaging, Three-Dimensional Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: J. appl. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil / United States Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de São Paulo/BR / University of Michigan/US

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Pharynx / Software / Cleft Lip / Cleft Palate / Imaging, Three-Dimensional Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: J. appl. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil / United States Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade de São Paulo/BR / University of Michigan/US