Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of efficacy of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine on postoperative pain control / Bloqueio do plano abdominal transverso guiado por ultrassom em pacientes submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica: comparação da eficácia de bupivacaína e levobupivacaína no controle da dor pós-operatória
Yıldırım Ar, Arzu; Erdoğan Arı, Dilek; Yiğit Kuplay, Yıldız; İşcan, Yalın; Karadoğan, Firdevs; Kırım, Damla; Akgün, Fatma Nur.
  • Yıldırım Ar, Arzu; Fatih Sultan Mehmet Educational and Research Hospital,. Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department. Istanbul. TR
  • Erdoğan Arı, Dilek; Fatih Sultan Mehmet Educational and Research Hospital,. Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department. Istanbul. TR
  • Yiğit Kuplay, Yıldız; Fatih Sultan Mehmet Educational and Research Hospital,. Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department. Istanbul. TR
  • İşcan, Yalın; Fatih Sultan Mehmet Educational and Research Hospital,. General Surgery Department. Istanbul. TR
  • Karadoğan, Firdevs; Fatih Sultan Mehmet Educational and Research Hospital,. Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department. Istanbul. TR
  • Kırım, Damla; Fatih Sultan Mehmet Educational and Research Hospital,. Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department. Istanbul. TR
  • Akgün, Fatma Nur; Fatih Sultan Mehmet Educational and Research Hospital,. Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department. Istanbul. TR
Rev. bras. anestesiol ; 68(5): 455-461, Sept.-Oct. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-958344
ABSTRACT
Abstract Background and objective The use of transversus abdominis plane block with different local anesthetics is considered as a part of multimodal analgesia regimen in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. However no studies have been published comparing bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for transversus abdominis plane block. We aimed to compare bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods Fifty patients (ASA I/II), undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated into two groups. Following anesthesia induction, ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block was performed with 30 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% in Group B (n = 25) and 30 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% in Group L (n = 25) for each side. The level of pain was evaluated using 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and during coughing 1, 5, 15, 30 min and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h after the operation. When visual analogue scale > 3, the patients received IV tenoxicam 20 mg. If visual analogue scale remained >3, they received IV. tramadol 1 mg.kg−1. In case of inadequate analgesia, a rescue analgesic was given. The analgesic requirement, time to first analgesic requirement was recorded. Results Visual analogue scale levels showed no difference except first and fifth minutes postoperatively where VAS was higher in Group L (p < 0.05). Analgesic requirement was similar in both groups. Time to first analgesic requirement was shorter in Group L (4.35 ± 6.92 min vs. 34.91 ± 86.26 min, p = 0.013). Conclusions Bupivacaine and levobupivacaine showed similar efficacy at TAP block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
RESUMO
Resumo Justificativa e objetivo O uso do bloqueio do plano transverso abdominal com diferentes anestésicos locais é considerado como parte do regime de analgesia multimodal em pacientes submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica. No entanto, nenhum estudo comparando bupivacaína e levobupivacaína para bloqueio do plano transverso abdominal foi publicado. Nosso objetivo foi comparar bupivacaína e levobupivacaína em bloqueio do plano transverso abdominal guiado por ultrassom em pacientes submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica. Métodos Cinquenta pacientes (ASA I/II), submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica foram alocados aleatoriamente em dois grupos. Após a indução da anestesia, o bloqueio do plano transverso abdominal bilateral guiado por ultrassom foi realizado com 30 mL de bupivacaína a 0,25% no Grupo B (n = 25) e 30 mL de levobupivacaína a 0,25% no Grupo L (n = 25) para cada lado. O nível de dor foi avaliado usando a escala visual analógica de 10 cm em repouso e durante a tosse em 1, 5, 15, 30 minutos e em 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 e 24 horas após a operação. Quando a escala visual analógica > 3, os pacientes receberam 10 mg de tenoxicam por via intravenosa (IV). Se a escala visual analógica permanecesse > 3, os pacientes recebiam tramadol IV (1 mg.kg−1). Em caso de analgesia inadequada, um analgésico de resgate foi administrado. A necessidade de analgésico e o tempo até a primeira solicitação de analgésico foram registrados. Resultados Os escores da escala visual analógica não mostraram diferença, exceto no primeiro e quinto minutos de pós-operatório, onde a escala visual analógica foi maior no Grupo L (p < 0,05). A necessidade de analgésico foi semelhante em ambos os grupos. O tempo até a primeira solicitação de analgésico foi menor no Grupo L (4,35 ± 6,92 min vs. 34,91 ± 86,26 min, p = 0,013). Conclusões Bupivacaína e levobupivacaína apresentaram eficácia similar no bloqueio TAP em pacientes submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Postoperative Care / Bupivacaine / Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / Levobupivacaine / Anesthesia, General Type of study: Controlled clinical trial Language: English Journal: Rev. bras. anestesiol Journal subject: Anesthesiology Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Turkey Institution/Affiliation country: Fatih Sultan Mehmet Educational and Research Hospital,/TR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Postoperative Care / Bupivacaine / Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / Levobupivacaine / Anesthesia, General Type of study: Controlled clinical trial Language: English Journal: Rev. bras. anestesiol Journal subject: Anesthesiology Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Turkey Institution/Affiliation country: Fatih Sultan Mehmet Educational and Research Hospital,/TR