Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of fixed appliances on two-phase orthopedic-orthodontic treatment
Neves, Leniana Santos; Canuto, Luiz Filiphe Gonçalves; Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont; Janson, Guilherme; Drummond, Alexandre Fortes; Henriques, José Fernando Castanha.
  • Neves, Leniana Santos; Federal University of Minas Gerais. Faculty of Dentistry. Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics. Belo Horizonte. BR
  • Canuto, Luiz Filiphe Gonçalves; Uninassau. Department of Orthodontics. Recife. BR
  • Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont; Ingá Faculty. Department of Orthodontics. Maringá. BR
  • Janson, Guilherme; University of São Paulo. Bauru Dental School. Department of Orthodontics. Bauru. BR
  • Drummond, Alexandre Fortes; Federal University of Minas Gerais. Faculty of Dentistry. Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics. Belo Horizonte. BR
  • Henriques, José Fernando Castanha; University of São Paulo. Bauru Dental School. Department of Orthodontics. Bauru. BR
Braz. j. oral sci ; 17: e18922, 2018. ilus
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-970501
ABSTRACT

Aim:

The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the effects of phase 2 with fixed appliances, after phase 1 Bionator treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion, as compared to a matching control group.

Methods:

The experimental group consisted of 20 patients who were evaluated after orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances subsequently to functional therapy with the Bionator in phase 1. A control group consisting of 20 Class II, division 1 individuals.

Results:

During phase 1 there was significant forward growth restriction in the maxillary complex, improvement of the maxillomandibular relationship and decrease in facial convexity. There was also significant reduction of the maxillary incisor proclination and protrusion, protrusion of the mandibular incisors, and vertical development of the mandibular molars. The overjet was significantly reduced and the molar relationship was significantly improved. Treatment during phase 2, with fixed appliances, resulted in significant maxillary forward growth restriction and facial convexity reduction.

Conclusion:

Major Class II skeletal and dentoalveolar anteroposterior correction was obtained during phase 1, with the Bionator. Phase 2, with fixed appliances only produced a significant maxillary forward growth restriction and facial convexity reduction, without any significant dentoalveolar change
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Orthodontics, Corrective / Activator Appliances / Malocclusion, Angle Class II Type of study: Observational study Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Federal University of Minas Gerais/BR / Ingá Faculty/BR / Uninassau/BR / University of São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Orthodontics, Corrective / Activator Appliances / Malocclusion, Angle Class II Type of study: Observational study Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Federal University of Minas Gerais/BR / Ingá Faculty/BR / Uninassau/BR / University of São Paulo/BR