Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diferencias en supervivencia debidas al aseguramiento en salud en pacientes con cáncer de mama atendidas en un centro oncológico de referencia en Medellín, Colombia / Survival difference due to types of health coverage in breast cancer patients treated at a specialized cancer center in Medellín, Colombia / Diferenças em sobrevivência devidas ao seguro de saúde em pacientes com câncer de mama atendidas em um centro ontológico de referência em Medellín, Colômbia
Egurrola-Pedraza, Jorge Armando; Gómez-Wolff, Luis Rodolfo; Ossa-Gómez, Carlos Andrés; Sánchez-Jiménez, Viviana; Herazo-Maya, Fernando; García-García, Héctor Iván.
  • Egurrola-Pedraza, Jorge Armando; Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín. CO
  • Gómez-Wolff, Luis Rodolfo; Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín. CO
  • Ossa-Gómez, Carlos Andrés; Instituto de Cancerología Las Américas. Medellín. CO
  • Sánchez-Jiménez, Viviana; Instituto de Cancerología Las Américas. Medellín. CO
  • Herazo-Maya, Fernando; Instituto de Cancerología Las Américas. Medellín. CO
  • García-García, Héctor Iván; Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín. CO
Cad. Saúde Pública (Online) ; 34(12): e00114117, 2018. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-974616
RESUMEN
Resumen El objetivo fue estimar el efecto del aseguramiento en salud sobre la supervivencia global y libre de enfermedad en pacientes con cáncer de mama. La muestra se compuso de mujeres operadas en el Instituto de Cancerología, Medellín, Colombia, con datos del registro institucional. Las variables se compararon entre régimen subsidiado y contributivo com chi cuadrado test (χ2) o test t de Student, método de Kaplan-Meier y prueba de rangos logarítmicos (log-rank test). La variable de interés se ajustó con una regresión de Cox. Se incluyeron 2.732 pacientes con mediana de seguimiento de 36 meses. Del régimen contributivo murieron el 10% y del régimen subsidiado murieron 23%. Hubo diferencias en tiempos de acceso a tratamiento (régimen contributivo 52 vs. régimen subsidiado 112 días, p < 0,05). Supervivencia libre de enfermedad y supervivencia global fueron mejores en régimen contributivo que en régimen subsidiado (p < 0,05); supervivencia global depende de variables del tumor y del tratamiento. Supervivencia global y supervivencia libre de enfermedad y tiempos de acceso para atención y diagnóstico en etapa temprana fueron mejores en régimen contributivo que en régimen subsidiado.
ABSTRACT
Abstract The study aimed to estimate the effect of health insurance on overall survival and disease-free survival in breast cancer patients undergoing surgery at the Las Américas Oncology Institute in Medellín, Colombia, with data from the institutional registry. The variables were compared between subsidized coverage and contributive coverage with chi-squared test (χ2) or Student t test, Kaplan-Meier, and log-rank test. The target variable was adjusted with Cox regression. There were 2,732 patients with a median follow-up of 36 months. Ten percent of the women with contributive coverage died, compared to 23% of the subsidized coverage group. There were differences in time-to-treatment (contributive group with 52 days versus subsidized group with 112 days, p < 0.05). Disease-free survival and overall survival were better in women with contributive coverage compared to those with subsidized coverage (p < 0.05), and overall survival varied according to tumor and treatment variables. Overall survival and disease-free survival and early time-to-diagnosis and treatment were better in patients with contributive coverage compared to those with subsidized coverage.
RESUMO
Resumo O objetivo deste trabalho foi estimar o efeito do seguro de saúde sobre a sobrevivência global e livre de doença em pacientes com câncer de mama. A amostra foi composta por mulheres operadas no Instituto de Cancerologia Las Américas em Medellín, Colombia, com dados do registro institucional. As variáveis foram comparadas entre o regime subsidiado e contributivo com teste do qui-quadrado (χ2) ou teste t de Student, método de Kaplan-Meier e log-rank test. A variável de interesse foi ajustada por meio de uma regressão de Cox. Foram incluídas 2.732 pacientes durante um período médio de acompanhamento de 36 meses. Do regime contributivo morreram 10% das mulheres e do regime subsidiado morreram 23%. Houve diferenças nos tempos de acesso ao tratamento (regime contributivo 52 vs. regime subsidiado 112 dias; p < 0,05). Sobrevivência livre de doença e sobrevivência global foram melhores em regime contributivo do que em regime subsidiado (p < 0,05); sobrevivência global depende de variáveis do tumor e do tratamento. Sobrevivência global e sobrevivência livre de doença e os tempos de acesso para atenção e diagnóstico no estágio inicial foram melhores em regime contributivo do que em regime subsidiado.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Insurance, Health Type of study: Etiology study / Incidence study / Observational study / Risk factors Limits: Adolescent / Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: South America / Colombia Language: Spanish Journal: Cad. Saúde Pública (Online) Journal subject: Sa£de P£blica / Toxicologia Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Colombia Institution/Affiliation country: Instituto de Cancerología Las Américas/CO / Universidad de Antioquia/CO

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Insurance, Health Type of study: Etiology study / Incidence study / Observational study / Risk factors Limits: Adolescent / Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: South America / Colombia Language: Spanish Journal: Cad. Saúde Pública (Online) Journal subject: Sa£de P£blica / Toxicologia Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Colombia Institution/Affiliation country: Instituto de Cancerología Las Américas/CO / Universidad de Antioquia/CO