Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efectividad de un modelo de manejo de pacientes con hipertensión y diabetes tipo II en atención primaria / Effectiveness of a case management intervention for high blood pressure and type II diabetes in primary health care
Poblete, Fernando; Barticevic, Nicolás; Bastías, Gabriel; Quevedo, Diego; Vargas, Irma.
  • Poblete, Fernando; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Escuela de Medicina. Departamento de Salud Pública. Santiago. CL
  • Barticevic, Nicolás; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Escuela de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Familiar. Santiago. CL
  • Bastías, Gabriel; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Escuela de Medicina. Departamento de Salud Pública. Santiago. CL
  • Quevedo, Diego; Corporación Municipal de La Florida. Centro de Salud Familiar Trinidad. Santiago. CL
  • Vargas, Irma; Ministerio de Salud. División de Atención Primaria. Santiago. CL
Rev. méd. Chile ; 146(11): 1269-1277, nov. 2018. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-985700
ABSTRACT

Background:

Adequate management of high blood pressure (HBP) and Type 2 Diabetes (DM2) is a challenge to the healthcare system in Chile.

Aim:

To evaluate the effectiveness of a case management (CM) approach to manage HBP and DMII at Primary Healthcare (PHC) level, headed by healthcare technicians with the supervision of registered nurses. Material and

Methods:

Two primary health care centers were selected. In one the case management approach was used and the other continued with the usual care model. Patients with HBP or DM2 were selected to participate in both centers. The main outcomes were changes blood pressure and glycosylated hemoglobin levels.

Results:

Three hundred twenty-eight patients were allocated to the intervention group and 316 to control group. At the baseline evaluation, participants at the control health center had better systolic and diastolic BP levels (SBP and DBP), but no difference in glycosylated hemoglobin. After twelve months the adjusted mean difference in HBP patients for SBP was −0.93 (95% conficence intervals (CI) −5.49,3.63) and for DBP was 1.78 (95%CI −2.89,6.43). Among HBP+DMII patients, the mean difference for SBP was −0.51 (95% −0.52,0.49) and for DBP was −3.39 (95%CI −6.07, −0.7). No differences in glycosylated hemoglobin were observed. In a secondary analysis, the intervention group showed a statistically significant higher SBP and DBP reduction than the control group.

Conclusions:

The case management approach tested in this study had promissory results among patients with high blood pressure.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Primary Health Care / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / Hypertension Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Evaluation studies / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: South America / Chile Language: Spanish Journal: Rev. méd. Chile Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Chile Institution/Affiliation country: Corporación Municipal de La Florida/CL / Ministerio de Salud/CL / Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile/CL

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Primary Health Care / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / Hypertension Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Evaluation studies / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: South America / Chile Language: Spanish Journal: Rev. méd. Chile Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Chile Institution/Affiliation country: Corporación Municipal de La Florida/CL / Ministerio de Salud/CL / Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile/CL