Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training
Barreira, Márcio Alencar; Siveira, Delano Gurgel; Rocha, Hermano Alexandre Lima; Moura Junior, Luiz Gonzaga de; Mesquita, Charles Jean Gomes de; Borges, Gleydson Cesar de Oliveira.
  • Barreira, Márcio Alencar; Universidade Federal do Ceará. Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio. Fortaleza. BR
  • Siveira, Delano Gurgel; UFC. Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio. Fortaleza. BR
  • Rocha, Hermano Alexandre Lima; Centro Universitário Christus. Professional Master's Degree Program in Minimally Invasive Technology and Simulation in Health. Fortaleza. BR
  • Moura Junior, Luiz Gonzaga de; UNICHRISTUS. Professional Master's Degree Program in Minimally Invasive Technology and Simulation in Health. Hospital Geral Dr. César Cals. Fortaleza. BR
  • Mesquita, Charles Jean Gomes de; UNICHRISTUS. Professional Master's Degree Program in Minimally Invasive Technology and Simulation in Health. Fortaleza. BR
  • Borges, Gleydson Cesar de Oliveira; UNICHRISTUS. Professional Master's Degree Program in Minimally Invasive Technology and Simulation in Health. Holy House of Mercy of Fortaleza. Fortaleza. BR
Acta cir. bras ; 34(3): e201900308, 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-989065
ABSTRACT
Abstract

Purpose:

To create a checklist to evaluate the performance and systematize the gastroenterostomy simulated training.

Methods:

Experimental longitudinal study of a quantitative character. The sample consisted of twelve general surgery residents. The training was divided into 5 sessions and consisted of participation in 20 gastroenterostomys in synthetic organs. The training was accompanied by an experienced surgeon who was responsible for the feedback and the anastomoses evaluation. The anastomoses evaluated were the first, fourth, sixth, eighth and tenth. A 10 item checklist and the time to evaluate performance were used.

Results:

Residents showed a reduction in operative time and evolution in the surgical technique statistically significant (p<0.01). The correlation index of 0.545 and 0,295 showed a high linear correlation between time variables and Checklist. The average Checklist score went from 6.8 to 9 points.

Conclusion:

The proposed checklist can be used to evaluate the performance and systematization of a simulated training aimed at configuring a gastroenterostomy.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Gastroenterostomy / Checklist / Simulation Training / Internship and Residency Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Acta cir. bras Journal subject: General Surgery / Procedimentos Cir£rgicos Operat¢rios Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Centro Universitário Christus/BR / UFC/BR / UNICHRISTUS/BR / Universidade Federal do Ceará/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Gastroenterostomy / Checklist / Simulation Training / Internship and Residency Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Acta cir. bras Journal subject: General Surgery / Procedimentos Cir£rgicos Operat¢rios Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Centro Universitário Christus/BR / UFC/BR / UNICHRISTUS/BR / Universidade Federal do Ceará/BR