Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia?
Melo, Florence de Lucca; Mendoza, Juan Fulgencio Welko; Latorraca, Carolina de Oliveira Cruz; Pacheco, Rafael Leite; Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera; Pachito, Daniela Vianna; Discipline of Evidence-Based MedicineRiera, Rachel.
  • Melo, Florence de Lucca; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. São Paulo. BR
  • Mendoza, Juan Fulgencio Welko; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. São Paulo. BR
  • Latorraca, Carolina de Oliveira Cruz; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Evidence-Based Health Program. São Paulo. BR
  • Pacheco, Rafael Leite; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Evidence-Based Health Program. São Paulo. BR
  • Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Evidence-Based Health Program. São Paulo. BR
  • Pachito, Daniela Vianna; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Evidence-Based Health Program. São Paulo. BR
  • Discipline of Evidence-Based MedicineRiera, Rachel; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. Discipline of Evidence-Based MedicineRiera, Rachel. São Paulo. BR
São Paulo med. j ; 136(6): 579-585, Nov.-Dec. 2018. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-991688
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND

OBJECTIVE:

Insomnia is a frequent complaint that generates more than five million visits to doctors per year in the United States. This study summarizes all Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) that evaluated interventions to treat insomnia. DESIGN AND

SETTING:

Review of SRs, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP).

METHODS:

A sensitive search was carried out in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify Cochrane SRs that assessed the effects of any type of intervention for people with insomnia. The results, main characteristics of the SRs and the certainty of the evidence obtained from them were synthesized and discussed.

RESULTS:

Seven SRs were included. They addressed the benefits and harm of acupuncture (n = 1), behavioral interventions (n = 1), music (n = 1), pharmacotherapy (n = 2), phototherapy (n = 1) and physical exercise (n = 1). The certainty of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low.

CONCLUSION:

Acupuncture, music, physical exercise, paroxetine, doxepin, trimipramine and trazodone seem to present some benefit for patients with insomnia. However, the uncertainty around these results means that no robust and definitive recommendations for clinical practice can be made until the benefits and harms from each intervention for patients with insomnia have been confirmed through further studies.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Evidence-Based Medicine / Systematic Reviews as Topic / Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Practice guideline / Prognostic study / Systematic reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: São Paulo med. j Journal subject: Cirurgia Geral / Ciˆncia / Ginecologia / Medicine / Medicina Interna / Obstetr¡cia / Pediatria / Sa£de Mental / Sa£de P£blica Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal de São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Evidence-Based Medicine / Systematic Reviews as Topic / Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Practice guideline / Prognostic study / Systematic reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: São Paulo med. j Journal subject: Cirurgia Geral / Ciˆncia / Ginecologia / Medicine / Medicina Interna / Obstetr¡cia / Pediatria / Sa£de Mental / Sa£de P£blica Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal de São Paulo/BR