Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical applicability of variations in arch dimensions and arch forms among various vertical facial patterns
JCPSP-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2011; 21 (11): 685-690
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-114223
ABSTRACT
To compare dental arch dimensions and arch forms in various vertical facial patterns. Cross-sectional comparative study. The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, from June 2007 to May 2008. Cases of age ranging 13-30 years were reviewed having full complement of teeth [upto second permanent molars] with less than 7 mm crowding. Exclusion criteria included presence of dental anomalies, previous dentoalveolar surgery, trauma or orthodontic treatment and craniofacial syndromes. One hundred cases including 40 normodivergent, 30 hypodivergent and 30 hyperdivergent facial patterns were selected. Occlusograms were made and various arch dimensions were measured. Arch forms were calculated according to ratios of three sagittal to three transverse dimensions. The mean age of the sample was 21 years and 5 months. Significant differences in arch dimensions were found only in maxillary total arch length [p=0.03] and mandibular posterior intermolar width [p=0.04]. Wide lower arches were predominant in all face types. Wide upper arches were predominant only in hypo- and hyperdivergent subjects. Statistically significant difference in arch dimensions was found only in maxillary total arch length and mandibular posterior intermolar width. A non-linear relationship was found between arch length and arch width. Wide lower arches were predominant in all face types whereas wide upper arches were predominant in hypo- and hyperdivergent

subjects:

Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Language: English Journal: J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak. Year: 2011

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Language: English Journal: J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak. Year: 2011