Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bacterial and parasitic profile of acute infectious pediatric diarrhoea and the role of faecal screening tests in prediction of the invasive type of diarrhoea
Bulletin of High Institute of Public Health [The]. 2010; 40 (1): 41-58
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-126308
ABSTRACT
Diarrhoea is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in children worldwide. Faecal screening methods as detection of faecal leucocytes, faecal lactoferrin and faecal occult blood, have diagnostic and therapeutic implications in the provisional diagnosis of invasive diarrhea before culture results made available. Aim of the work was to outline the bacterial and parasitic profile of acute pediatric diarrhoea and to evaluate faecal screening test in preliminary diagnosis of invasive diarrhoea. Three hundred children under five years of age, suffering from acute diarrhoea [<4 days] and attending the out-patient clinic of El Shatby Children's University Hospital in Alexandria over a period of 1 year, were recruited in the study. Stool samples were collected from the children and were subjected to bacteriological examination, parasitological examination and 3 faecal screening tests to distinguish invasive [inflammatory] from non invasive [non inflammatory] diarrhoea. Forty eight percent of samples were positive for enteric pathogens. Enteric bacterial pathogens were isolated from 25% of samples. Parasites 29% and mixed bacterial and parasitic infections were detected in 6% of samples. Enterotoxigenic E.coli [ETEC] was the most common bacterial isolate detected in 10% of samples, followed by Salmonella [8%], Shigella [6.67%] Campylobacter [5%] and Vibrio parahaemolyticus [1.33%]. Cryptosporidium was the most commonly identified parasite [13%] followed by Giardi lamblia [11%], Entamoeba histolytica [8%] and Cyclospora cayetanensis [3%]. Ascaris lumbricoides and Haeminolipus nana were only identified in 1% of samples, each. The gold standard for evaluation of faecal screening tests was positive culture for invasive bacterial pathogens and/or positive E. histolytica on microscopic examination of stool samples. Leuko test had the highest sensitivity [85.54%], specificity [73.73%], positive predictive value [55.47%], negative predictive value [93.02%] and accuracy [77%]. False positive results of the Leuko-test were significantly higher in the breast-fed children than non breast-fed ones [26.7%, 11.7% respectively, p<0.01]. Better sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the Leuko-test was recorded in the non breast-fed children than in the breast-fed ones. The recorded values in the first group were 91.11%. 83.64%, 69.5% and 95.83%, respectively compared to 78.95%, 63.55%, 43.48% and 89.47% respectively in the second group. The study concluded that, Leuko test is the best applicable faecal screening test in differentiation of invasive and non invasive diarrhoea but is better avoided in breast-fed infants as many false positive results might be interpreted
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Main subject: Salmonella / Shigella / Child / Mass Screening / Giardia lamblia / Diarrhea / Escherichia coli / Feces / Hospitals, University Type of study: Screening study Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Bull. High Inst. Public Health Year: 2010

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Search on Google
Index: IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean) Main subject: Salmonella / Shigella / Child / Mass Screening / Giardia lamblia / Diarrhea / Escherichia coli / Feces / Hospitals, University Type of study: Screening study Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Bull. High Inst. Public Health Year: 2010